find the inverse laplace transform of (3/(2s+5)^3).
hmm factor out the 2 is my first thought; try to get this into: 1/(s+k)^3
I'm confused on how to do this problem in general. i don't know what Laplace transform is
if you dont know what Laplace transform is, then you reallya re asking the wrong question to begin with .....
the Laplace transform is an integral transform that .. well, transforms a function from an integration to an algebra problem
there is a table of Laplace transforms that we try to get this thing to look like in order to undo it back into what it looked like to begin with
my idea for the inverse is to basically format it into something invertable
\[\frac{3}{(2(s+\frac{5}{2}))^3}\] \[\frac{3}{8(s+\frac{5}{2})^3}\] \[\frac{2*\frac{3}{2}}{8(s+\frac{5}{2})^3}\] \[\frac{3}{16}L\left\{\frac{2}{(s+\frac{5}{2})^3}\right\}\]
i got no idea how right t is tho; so id have to chk my resulte wolfs with th
laptop mistype me up lol
why do the initial variable x become t?
is it supposed to show that it's not the original problem?
the Laplace transform takes a function of one variable; namely t and transforms it into a function of another variable, namely s ; but i chose x in this place cause the wolf was being nitpicky and wanted to read the s as seconds instead of a variable ....
so after you formed the function to a more workable problem, you just plug into a formula?
the laplace tables tell me: L{t^n} = n!/s^(n+1) so if I can get the function you provided into this format, I can undo (or invert) the Laplace transform to get back to the original function i just wasnt to sure what i should do to the extra +5/2 in the bottom
the site seems buggy tonight ...
what do you mean by the original function?
and how do you get from L (2/(s+5/2)^3) to plug into the form n!/s^(n+1)
where is n?
since the underside has ^3; which matches up to ^(n+1) ; n has to equal 2
2*3/2 = 3 so I just rewrote the top to my advantage
same with the bottom; i factored out a 2 down there
pull the constants out that aint needed and your set to undo it
so can we completely ignore constants?
the Laplace is a linear transform, meaning it has the following properties L{a+b} = L{a} + L{b} and for any constant k, L{ka} = k L{a} so the constants can be pulled out as concerns the actual operations
oh that makes sense!
as such, we can format these things by using constants to get them to a proper form that can be inverted
thank you!
youre welcome
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!