Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 17 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Prove that factorial of a number can never be a perfect square.

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

n(n-1)*(n-2)*...(2)=n^2 assume that it can.

OpenStudy (zarkon):

1!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Except that,

OpenStudy (zarkon):

0!

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

@zarkon, -.-

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

(n-1)(n-2)*...(2)=n

OpenStudy (unklerhaukus):

that is disproving it @zarkon

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@inkyvoyd Not necessarily n^2 Any k^2

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oops too late

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

ahhg.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

NOT 1, guys. Excewpt that

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Somewhere in the expansion of n! there is the largest prime factor. (If n is prime, it is n itself, otherwise you have to go looking for it.) But if it is the largest prime factor, it only occurs once, and therefore n! cannot be a square, since in a square every prime factor occurs an even number of times.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@inkyvoyd be careful here, it is not saying that \(n^2=n!\) but rather that \(n^2=m!\)

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

Yes, I just realized that, and I think sim got the answe r-.-

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

but wait, he didn't,.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@simamura CAn you prove your conjecture?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

How about using Bertrand's Postulate?

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

i think we use mathematical induction for this one.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ohhh. Nice FFM. That states that precisely, right?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yeah but better make base case \(n=2\) because as zarkon noted it is false for \(n=1\)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

True. Its proved by induction using log right?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

this is not trivial there is stuff to be done

OpenStudy (anonymous):

There is a always a prime between \(n\) and \(2n\). This means there is prime \(p \) that divides \(n!\) but \(p^2\) does not then \( n!,n>1\) would have even number of divisors always, but a perfect square must have odd number of divisors hence ... QED.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Trivial? Pretty complicated proof to here.

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

FFM, only, you used a theorem itself that is really hard to prove.

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

I'd like something more elegant, in the sense that we don't prove something "simpler" with something more difficult.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Agreed.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Theorems are meant to be used ;)

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

We are trying to prove that the square root of all factorials is not rational, correct? (besides 1)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Correct.

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

This has something to do with the gamma function, I bet.

OpenStudy (blockcolder):

I wonder if we can use the fact that the product of consecutive integers is always one less than a perfect square.

OpenStudy (blockcolder):

4 consecutive integers, I meant.

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

That's it block, I think.

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

But, your statement is incorrect :S

OpenStudy (blockcolder):

It's correct and I can prove it.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/31973/

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

(n-1)(n+1)(n)(n+2)=(n^3-n)(n+2)=n^4+2n^3-n^2-2n n^4+2n^3-n^2-2n+1 does not appear to be a perfect square in any way.

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

Or does it? Gimme a sec.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/12544/

OpenStudy (blockcolder):

I wrote "one less than a perfect square". :P

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

So, n^4+2n^3-n^2-2n+1 must be a perfect square if n is a natural number

OpenStudy (anonymous):

(n^2 +n + 1)^2

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

lool I fail

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

So, we can prove that 4 consecutive numbers are not a perfect square.

OpenStudy (blockcolder):

\[n(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)=(n^2+3n)(n^2+3n+2)=[(n^2+3n+1)-1][(n^2+3n+1)+1]\\ =(n^2+3n+1)^2-1\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Wait, not quit... (n^2+n -1)^2 = (n^2 +n -1)(n^2 +n -1) = n^4 + n^3 -n^2 +n^3 +n^2 -n -n^2 -n +1 = n^4 +2n^3-n^2-2n +1 There we go. It's (n^2 + n -1)^2 not (n^2 +n +1)^2 like I said originally.

OpenStudy (blockcolder):

My last equation got cut off, let me rewrite: \[n(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)=(n^2+3n)(n^2+3n+2)\\ =[(n^2+3n+1)-1][(n^2+3n+1)+1]\\ =(n^2+3n+1)^2-1\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

It seems like you can break this down into cases and use induction on each case... perhaps?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Cases based on number of consecutive numbers being multiplied, that is.

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

(n)(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)=u^2-1 (n)(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)(n+3+1) =u^2-1+(u^2-1)(n+3) u^2-1+(u^2-1)(n+3)+(u^2-1)(n+4)

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

I might have it.

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

n(n+1)=n^2+n a perfect square would be in the form n^2+2n+1 in other words, n^2+n=n^2+2n+1 n=-1, which is not an integer, so n(n+1) is never a perfect square.

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

Then, n(n+1)(n+2) =n(n+1)(n)+n(n+1)(2), which is never a perfect square (someone give me the proof)

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

since that is never a perfect square, n(n+1)(n+2)(n)+n(n+1)(n+2)(3) which is never a perfect square? I've not reduced the problem down any. -.-

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

maybe instead of n, i'll just have 1.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!