The figure below shows two triangles that were constructed using a compass and straightedge. Riley used the SAS postulate to prove that triangle PQR is congruent to triangle LMN. As part of the proof Riley showed that side PQ is congruent to side LM. Using this congruency, which of these other steps would Riley have likely performed to prove that the two triangles are congruent by the SAS postulate? A.) Place the compass on L and set the width to LM. B.) Place the compass on L and draw an arc that passes through points N and M. C.) Place the compass on R and draw an arc to cross side QR at
@ash2326 can you help me with this problem
brb
Are you here?
yes
Sorry, I kept you waiting
its ok
It's given that the two triangles were constructed and were proved congruent using SAS Here PQ= LM there are three options Let's read what each says
A.) Place the compass on L and set the width to LM. This one is a valid step to measure LM and then draw PQ equal to LM
b) Place the compass on L and draw an arc that passes through points N and M This will make LN=LM but we are not provided with any such info, so this is a wrong step
c) Place the compass on R and draw an arc to cross side QR at... @Robb828 I think the last part is missing
it is give me a sec
C.) Place the compass on R and draw an arc to cross side QR at X and side RP at Y. Place the compass on X and set the width of the compass to segment XY. D.) Place the compass on P and draw an arc to cross side PR at X and side PQ at Y. Place the compass on X and set the width of the compass to segment XY.
Both of these steps intend to create extra segment XY (not shown anywhere), so these two are also not correct steps
so its A?
Yeah:)
thank you :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!