is electricity's speed instantaneous?
nope.
even light is not instantaneious
lol physics.
if i have a switch in canada that connects to a lamp in china, as soon as i turn on the switch, at the same time, the lamp will light on, right?
you will have some delay,
it'll take a really short time, but not instantaneous.
Think about it this way, have you ever seen when you plug in something into an outlet and there's a spark. that's the electricity traveling...or better yet, think about lightning.
why delay? I mean, looking at the atomic structure of a electricity line. When i turn on the switch, the first electron will push the second one, and the second one will push the third one, the third one push the fourth one, ALL AT THE SAME TIME. So when the 1st one (at canada) moves, the last one (at china) will also move. Thus, the lamp will light on at soon at the switch turns on...
That is true. but wouldnt you agree that it takes time for that first electron to push?
Now that's going into quantum stuff. It get's really weird there, but there is a delay.
yea but as soon as u turn on the switch, the first electron will push lol
yeah and that takes time....there isn't really an argument in this. speed of signal propagation is close to that of light, or about a foot per nanosecond.
imagine the electricity line like a train, the first wagon is in Canada, the last wagon in China. Thus, the entire train is always moving at the same time..
Why not ask "If I have a giant metal pole that's 2 light years long, and I push this end of it, wouldn't the other end move at the same time?" The answer is no. Because of weird things that happen with atoms of the metal interacting at a speed less than the speed of light.
its weird
okay if you are using that chain argument, it isn't the electron where you that is moving all the way to china. It is ALL THE ELECTRONS in that chain moving that small distance. The elctron where you are never traveled all the way to china
It is a flow.
We actually don't use a direct current we use alternating current. So if goes back and forth.
@Puzzhang it's totally true, however, as soon as the first one moves, the last one responds, and lights up the light. The first one doesn't need to travel all the way to China.
well, electric field travels at the speed of light. when you have switched a circuit on, it means that you have switched the electric field on , which in turn creates motion in the locally free charged particles
And you can slow that flow with resistors.
It takes time for the signal to propagate from the first electron to the last electron. It's quick, but not instantaneous. Like I said before, this is basically the same thing as the question "If I have a giant metal pole that's 2 light years long, and I push this end of it, wouldn't the other end move at the same time and thus propagate the signal instantaneously?" The answer is no. It doesn't propagate instantly.
Special relativity.
no, you cannot slow the propagating field. resistors only dissipate the energy of the charged particles. they don't slow the field down. special relativity is not what we are speaking about.@Romero
so if i have a metal pole that's 100m long, I push one end, does the other end move at the same time?
no it doesn't. there always is a lag
so if i have a single atom in my hand, I push one end, does the other end move at the same time?
even then it will only move at the speed it is moving at on your end as you push it which will never be an instantaneous blink from one position in space to another.
@Puzzhang yes, but as one end moves, the other end moves at the same time, don't you agree?
of course it takes time from the first end to travel from one space to another, but the WHOLE THING, thus(one end of the atom, and the other end of the atom) will move at same time
Even then, it won't move at exactly the same time because there are other forces slowing it down.
what about this, think that metal pole is falling from the earth vertically, when one end moves, don't you agree that the other end moves at the same time. Or else the metal pole will stretch out
hey, don't go to atomic level, because nobody has seen how it looks like. all we have is some gentlemen predictions of its shape
if you are creating a gravity field in which the whole field will act on the atom, then everything moves at the same time. however in your example of using a hand pushing an atom. you'd be using photons which would naturally push against the electromagnetic field or w/e which would then push the nucleus.
In gravity, the metal pole does stretch out actually.
a metal pole does stretch out while falling under gravity
@vamgadu No it doesn't
so the satellite that's continuously falling down to Earth due to gravity, is going longer and longer and longer. Same thing will the whole solar system, everything is stretching out constantly
@Romero can you prove that it doesn't?
What do you mean by this "is going longer and longer and longer"
It's not stretching out any more. While under increasing/decreasing gravity, it's length appears to change. If it's under a constant gravitational field, the length appears to stay the same.
streching out
Objects have their own gravity that keep them solid.
yes they do, so do you think the pen thats right now in my hand is together because of gravity?
then explain why doesn't car stretch out?
No it's because of normal forces
gravity is a week force when considering very small bodies of low density
Because our atomic structure is strong enough to prevent the force of gravity from stretching us out.
so if you are considering a metal rod, can we agree that its held together because of the bond forces (what ever) that are existing between neighbouring atoms?
ok let's be clear here: 1) A metal pole 1000 meters long, if I push one end of it, the other end will NOT move at the same time 2) A car, if I push one end, will the other end move at the same time?
no it takes time
for the force to travel unless you are applying an impulse
then how long exactly is the delay?
long enough for the electrons in the front to experience force enough to move
and that force's speed < speed of light, is that what you are saying?
Force doesn't have speed....
Is that right?
yes its right but the effect of it has speed
so if i have an object that's 3x10^8m long, when one end moves, the other end will move in ONE second, assuming that the 'effect of it' travels at the speed of light
I think I have heard this question before but said differently. Like if you have a strong enough laser to see it when you point to the moon if you move the laser slightly then the laser on the moon moves really fast, faster than the speed of light.
speed here does not imply distance by time you cannot really say how long the effect takes to reach the final point.if you take a quintal of mercury , because of viscousity it has, the effect may die down in between
how can the point move so fast? if you have moved the laser, then that information is carried by light to the final point which itself travels at c. so are you telling me that before getting the information itself the light has moved to the final point and reaches its new position?
electron speed is actually preaty slow, what is fast is the transmition of magnetic field, which moves at speed of light
@myko but the question that's intriguing is, if i have metal pole that's 100m long, when i push one end, does the other end move at the same time?
hmm.... I guess not. Since any fisical body has some elasticity , that can be very small. That means it would take time to transmit the force from one end to the other
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!