Ann wrote the following steps to simplify the expression (−y + 3y + 2x). Step 1: −2x + y + 3y; using commutative property of addition Step 2: −2x + (y + 3y); using associative property of addition Step 3: −2x + (1 + 3)y; using distributive property of addition Step 4: −2x + (4)y; simplifying
Which step was incorrect, and what should be the correct step that Ann should use? Step 2 was incorrect. Correct step: −2x − (y − 3y); using associative property of addition Step 1 was incorrect. Correct step: 2x + y − 3y; using commutative property of addition Step 1 was incorrect. Correct step:
−2x + (y − 3y); using associative property of addition
Step 1 is incorrect since the commutative property of addition allows you to swap terms (but not signs) Unfortunately none of the answers match the original expression −y + 3y + 2x, so there has to be a typo somewhere.
Which step was incorrect, and what should be the correct step that Ann should use? Step 2 was incorrect. Correct step: −2x − (y − 3y); using associative property of addition Step 1 was incorrect. Correct step: 2x + y − 3y; using commutative property of addition Step 1 was incorrect. Correct step: 2x +3y − y; using commutative property of addition Step 2 was incorrect. Correct step: −2x + (y − 3y); using associative property of addition
third option
Yes, using the commutative property of addition, we can swap terms to get what we see in choice C
Thank you both
you're welcome
welcome, but jim_thompson did all the work
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!