The figure below shows a transversal t which intersects the parallel lines AB and CD. http://go.flvs.net/courses/1/flvs_57_3641_12676/ppg/respondus/pool_Geom_3641_0908_14/image0044e7349ab.jpg prove that the sum of the measures of angle 1 and angle 2 is equal to 180°.
wow I had this same question!
hold on
haha mmk thanks!
1 SEC
kk
oh no I forgot abt u needing help srry
haha it's ok it's my last question for this assighnment
hey if you can't help it's ok
<1 and <3 are a linear pair, therefore their angle measure is equal to 180 degrees. <2 and <3 are alternate interior angles so their measures are also equal to 180 degrees. Does this help?
yes thanks! =)
wait are you sure angles 2 and 3 add up to 180 to?
Yep! They are alternate interior angles.
ok well thanks for the help!
Sure! I think we may be working on the same test. Is it for geometry at FLVS?
yepp!!
Fun! Good luck! I'm stuck on one of the questions :/
thanks i just finished i got like 8 wrong thats not including the fact idk what i got on the written responces so =p but yeahh post your questions i stink at math but theres alot of people really good at it and good at helping on here to
Yeah, I posted it. It's not entirely simple though so people aren't answering it :( Oh well! I'll try my best.
heree send me the link to you question ill send it to @experimentX he is really good and helpful mmaybe he could help
Thanks! I messaged him.
mmks np =) goodluck!
?? i was here since you tagged me
haha i just tagged you so you would see i was hoping you could help xxaloserlikemexx out
And don't be fooled by the username. It's a thing from a TV show. I'm actually quite good at math.
haha ok =)
what's the question??
18. Read the two statements shown below. If the weather is not cold, Meg will go swimming. The weather is cold, or Meg will go swimming. Create truth tables for the logical form of the two statements (not to be submitted). Use the truth tables to determine whether the two statements are logically equivalent. Justify your answer.
http://openstudy.com/users/xxloserlikemexx#/updates/4fb3e325e4b055653429b3f7 theres the link
The only thing I'm having trouble with in geometry are these types of questions.
lol @cbrusoe ... did you follow the link i gave you?? it's exactly same as the link i posted. just replacing p and q by two parts of the single statement!!
This is my work so far: Let p and q be two statements. p: The weather is cold. q: Meg will go swimming. If the weather is not cold, Meg will go swimming. This statement is symbolically written as ~p → q. The weather is cold, or Meg will go swimming. This statement is symbolically written as p v q. Now I have to make a truth table for both to see whether they are equivalent or not.
lol why did you tag me on my question? ;p haha and what about the link?
If the weather is not cold, Meg will go swimming. ==== false
oooh i had this same question... hahaha
yeahh he is good at helping with this stuff for sure lol @experimentX do you want me to go get the links u posted for me?
I'm still confused as to why it's false though.
Sorry ... i didn't see not there If the weather is cold, Meg will go swimming. ==== false If the weather is NOT cold, Meg will go swimming ==== true If the weather is cold, Meg will NOT go swimming ==== true If the weather is NOT cold, Meg will NOT go swimming ==== true
you could have put that in reply to my question instead of the links -___- lol
This is basically my last resort. My teacher isn't calling me back and I need to finish this test. So the statements are not logically equivalent? Or are they? I'm still confused.
this is your truth table of first statement The weather is cold, or Meg will go swimming === true The weather is NOT cold, or Meg will go swimming === true The weather is cold, or Meg will NOT go swimming === true The weather is NOT cold, or Meg will NOT go swimming === false
they aren't logically equivalent the first one is true the second one uses or in it's statement so the second statement is either or true
did i get that right @experimentX?
Okay, that makes sense. I'm not exactly sure how to do the other one though. I believe since it uses the "or" only one of the parts has to be true for the statement to be true. Am I correct?
If you take weather is NOT cold => true Meg will go swimming => true Then, The weather is cold, or Meg will go swimming === true The weather is NOT cold, or Meg will go swimming === true The weather is cold, or Meg will NOT go swimming === false The weather is NOT cold, or Meg will NOT go swimming === true You see ... Meg doesn't five a damn about weather!!
Hehe that made me laugh! So they are not logically equivalent? Because don't the truth tables have to be equal or something? My teacher is horrible at explaining concepts and I'm pretty sure she said that, but not completely.
XD I enjoyed that explanation
OR <--- mathematically means ... if one of them is true ... the whole is true ... so if Meg goes to swimming or Weather is good .... then it's time for party!!
=) =) =)
I hope you understand ... and next time don't shoot this type of question on me!!
Okay! That makes much more sense. So, in the first statement she /does/ care about the weather and the second she doesn't?
I'm sorry. It was very helpful though, thank you! :)
lol mmks thanks @experimentX =)
okay ... though i did not expect you to read these stuffs in 9th grade!!
I'm actually in 8th grade. I'm taking honors geometry. :)
=p yeahh what grade are u in @experimentX or are u graduated nd all
I am graduate!!
otays cool
seeya
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!