What did I do wrong here? I am getting ln|1-1|.... http://i1084.photobucket.com/albums/j409/QRAWarrior/MATA36-IMG007a.png http://i1084.photobucket.com/albums/j409/QRAWarrior/MATA36-IMG007b.png
Its quite fade
try zooming in
Where are people getting this bicycle avatars from?
these*
Is it \[\int\limits \left(\ln \left(x+\sqrt{x^2+1}\right)-10\right) \, dx\]
The integral is: The definite integral from 1 to \sqrt{2} of: ln[x + \sqrt{x^2-1}] dx
did you try wolfram?
No, and I do not want to. That just gives it away, or it does it in some other wacky method
i think it gives the best solution , because other than integration by parts, there's no other way you could do this
\[\int\limits_{?}^{?}\ln (x+\sqrt{x^{2}-1}) dx\] Let x = sec (w) dx = sec(w)tan(w) dw \[\rightarrow \int\limits_{?}^{?} \ln(\sec w + \tan w)* (\sec w \tan w) dw\] Note: \[\int\limits_{?}^{?} \sec w = \ln(\sec w +\tan w)\] \[\frac{d}{dw} \sec w = \sec w \tan w\] use integration by parts: u = ln(sec(w) +tan(w)) ........... dv = sec(w) tan(w) du = sec(w) .......................... v = sec(w) \[\rightarrow \sec w \ln(\sec w +\tan w) -\int\limits_{?}^{?} \sec^{2} w \] \[\rightarrow \sec w \ln(\sec w +\tan w) - \tan w\] substituting back in for x \[\rightarrow x \ln(x+\sqrt{x^{2}-1}) - \sqrt{x^{2}-1}\] Now evaluate from 1 to sqrt2
Ok I see, so you are going to use trig sub for the argument. Thanks for the suggestion,
no problem..you don't have to, you can go straight to integration by parts as wolfram does but this way it may be easier if you comfortable with trig
Did you use ( lnu )' ?
what are you referring to ?
Let u = x + sqrt ( x^2 + 1) du = dx/ sqrt ( x^2 +1)
dv = dx -> v = x
correct...yes except i did a trig substitution first
Integral by part: = xln( x + sqrt ( x^2 +1) - sqrt ( x^2 -1)
I'm unfamiliar with plugging the values :/
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!