Question

Please, I want a PhD holder or experienced MSc holder to help me go through this paper and make corrections. It is part of my PhD seminar papers

Answer 1

Srry we cant do that. You wont learn anything from it, also that would be considered cheating.

Answer 2

How? it is my research paper, i just want somebody to check my grammar and logical reasonings. open it and see what it contain.

Answer 3

You basically asking us to do your work.

Answer 4

No. I have done my work but just somebody to double check my grammar and flow and reasonings. Anyway, if you are not willing, no compulsion.

Answer 5

I guess it's okay @Carniel , he just wants someone for proof-reading. Hmm.

Answer 6

@apoorvk Help him ;)

Answer 7

I Want an experienced persons as described above. One cannot be too sure of everything.

Answer 8

I guess @blues is the person who can help you ;)

Answer 9

apoorvk, thanks very much

Answer 10

Please, anyone, irrespective of qualification, help me go through that attachment. Thanks.

Answer 11

Uploaded a reviewed file.

There a few extremely minor grammatical errors, which I have corrected. Also, I was doubtful about a few words which I have underlined and the corrections or suggestions are in BOLD.
Please have a look :)

Otherwise your paper is flawless - amazing presentation and the content is very apt, precise, and good. However, you could underline or 'bold' important words and sentences to draw attention to them - of that is fine with you allowed.

All cool. Great work!

Answer 12

I also have uploaded an edited file.

Overall, it is well written and interesting - it definitely makes me interested in the rest of your work.

Like Apoorvk, I made some grammatical and semantic corrections. You end your sentences in words "-ly" words, start new sentences with "therefore" and "however" when you should use semi-colons and should avoid a passive voice ("is" "was" "were" sentences) whenever possible.

I chopped the abstract about quite a bit for structure and coherence. The intro needed less work. Your work summary in your abstract now flows like this:

1. Present test groups and experimental design
2. Present things you measured to assess differences between control and tests
3. What you found.

One big note: I strongly advise you to remember the extent of your work (to rats only, not humans) and DO NOT extend your conclusion beyond it. Your readership is intelligent: they appreciate the obvious implications of your work to humans - just as they appreciate that they are implications, not something you have data on or can make conclusions about. You might want to formally recognize that that adding something along the lines of, "These encouraging results in rats justify statistic studies of effects in humans (of course, within the bounds of what is ethically possible)."

I did not go so far as to check your sources and make sure that you have cited them correctly, nor is the science my area of expertise; however, you know your subject and I trust you got it right.

Answer 13

**if that is fine with you and allowed^ - typos -_-