Question is in the picture.. YAh!
IT'S A HARD ONE!

Question

anonymous · Answer

attachment

phi · Answer

I must say, this "proof" has a problem with it.  It states: "construct a perpendicular bisector"  
But you can only guarantee being able to either construct a bisector or construct a perpendicular.  Only under special circumstances can you construct a single line segment that is both.   So the fact that they are assuming you can construct a perpendicular bisector is assuming what we want to prove....

anonymous · Answer

so what do you think it is? Because I have no idea.

phi · Answer

Are the last 2 choices really the same?

anonymous · Answer

it would seem so lol.

phi · Answer

The choice they label "congruent parts of congruent triangles are congruent"  is close to silly.  They perhaps mean "corresponding parts of congruent triangles are congruent"

This looks like a really bad question.

phi · Answer

@FoolForMath Any thoughts on this question?

anonymous · Answer

Yea, Idk it's part of the study guide for the exam

anonymous · Answer

@ParthKohli can you take a look at this and tell me if you can find the solution?