Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 20 Online
OpenStudy (moongazer):

What is the meaning of "converse" and "inverse" in Math?

OpenStudy (moongazer):

It has something to do with logic

OpenStudy (anonymous):

converse: q -> p the hypothesis and the conclusion switch places -- the conclusion becomes the hypothesis, the hypothesis becomes the conclusion.. inverse: not p -> not q negate both the hypothesis and the conclusion

OpenStudy (anonymous):

converse of a statement that says "if P then Q" is the statement "if Q, then P"

OpenStudy (anonymous):

contrapositive (a combination of the converse and the inverse): not q -> not p negate and switch the hypothesis and the conclusion..

OpenStudy (anonymous):

converse: If I am in China, then I am in Bejing. (The conclusion and hypothesis have switched places. Notice that the converse of a true conditional statement is not guaranteed to be true.)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

for example, converse of "if \(x=3\) then \(x^2=9\)" is "if \(x^2=9\) then \(x=3\) first statement is true, second is false, which means the converse of a statement is not logically equivalent to the statement

OpenStudy (anonymous):

inverse: If I am not in Bejing, then I am not in China. (Like the converse, the inverse of a true condition may not always true.).

OpenStudy (anonymous):

contrapositive: If I am not in China, then I am not in Bejing. (Note: If the conditional statement is true, the contrapositive will always be true too.)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

converse is when you switch them. like girls who wear converse sneakers when the play basketball the ball makes a swoosh sound when it goes in. so think converse swoosh and swoosh sounds like switch.

OpenStudy (amistre64):

i always think converse and inverse in logic is backwards

OpenStudy (amistre64):

inverse to me is an undoing; so q -> p would make sense; but its not lol

OpenStudy (moongazer):

So if the statement says "All pairs of vertical angles are congruent angles." the inverse will be: "All pairs of angles that are not vertical angles are not congruent angles." and the converse is: "All pairs that are congruent angles are vertical angles." and the contrapositive is: "All pairs that are not congruent angles are not vertical angles." Is this correct?

OpenStudy (moongazer):

Anyone?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

can you form that into an if then statement?

OpenStudy (moongazer):

ok

OpenStudy (amistre64):

if "a pair of angles are vertical", then "they are congruent" looks to be a good mock up of it ...

OpenStudy (amistre64):

so yeah, that looks good

OpenStudy (moongazer):

How about this? So if the statement says "All pairs of vertical angles are congruent angles." the inverse will be: "If All pairs of angles are not vertical angles, then all pairs of angles are not congruent." and the converse is: "If all pairs of angles are congruent, then all pairs of angles are vertical." and the contrapositive is: "If all pairs of angles are not congruent, then all pairs of angles are not vertical."

OpenStudy (amistre64):

yep, inverse negates, converse swaps, and contraP negates and swaps

OpenStudy (moongazer):

Thanks :)

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!