Question

\[\int\limits (dx)^2\] = ?

Answer 1

integral of (dx)^2?? o.O

Answer 2

maybe the result will be a first derivative =_=

Answer 3

xdx maybe?

Answer 4

Well, if dx is the infinitesimal change in x, then dx^2 is an even more infinitesimal change in x, so dx^2=dx, so the answer is x :P

Answer 5

Not a real question.

Answer 6

so infinitesimal infinitesimal is just the same infinitesimal?

Answer 7

If you take something infinitely small and then make it smaller, you still have something infinitely small. Just like how \(\infty+1=\infty\).

Answer 8

This notation isn't defined.

In any sense.

Answer 9

The one thing I didn't account for is that dx could be negative, which would make dx^2 -dx, which would make the primitive \(\pm x\)

Answer 10

i wasn't geting what it means.

Answer 11

Is this even possible? I dont think it makes any sense

Answer 12

indeed =_=

Answer 13

No, this isn't possible, and it doesn't make sense, I'm just making jokes. Bad math jokes that nobody finds funny.

Answer 14

is this the problem itself @binary3i ? or is it a result of your solution?

Answer 15

That's like saying
\(3(+)^{2}3\)

Answer 16

That's not exactly defined.

Answer 17

Good math jokes that everybody finds funny: http://spikedmath.com/

Answer 18

Guys, guys,...

We can only beat a deadhouse an infinitesimal amount of time.

Answer 19

math jokes were never meant to be funny

Answer 20

deadhorse*

Answer 21

An abelian grape!

Answer 22

thanks guys.
lol

Answer 23

Somewhat related: No neutrinos are welcome to this bar. A neutrino entered the bar.

Answer 24

neutrinos?

Answer 25

@FoolForGirls, it's a reference to the false discovery that neutrinos travel faster than light.

Answer 26

ommigosh :O

Answer 27

lol @inkyvoyd you have been typing for tooooooo long lad.

Answer 28

It's actually glitched. I haven't even focused on the textbox
-_-