@Limitless can you tell me what that capital pi meant? \(n!=\prod_{1 \leq f \leq n}f=1\cdot 2\cdot 3\cdots n\) Can I have more examples please?
multiply
just like \(\sum\) means add
I don't get how that represents factorial. what's up with the f?
\(f\) is the index of the productand. You multiply through all \(f\) in the set \(\{1,\dots,n\}\).
the \(1\leq f\leq n\) tells you to multiply all the numbers together between 1 and n
Hmmm I think I'm getting it.... more examples please?
just like you could write \[\sum_{1\leq k\leq n}k\] to mean add all the numbers between one and n
\[\prod_{1 \leq q \leq n}(q+1)=(1+1)(2+1)(3+1)\cdots(n+1)=(q+1)!\]
\(k\) is constant, if I'm not wrong
No, \(k\) is being used as an index.
What if I want to multiply all numbers between 1 and 10?
Let \(n=10\) :P
\( \color{Black}{\Rightarrow \prod_{1 \le f\le 10} f }\) Something like this?
i.e. \[\prod_{1 \leq q \leq 10}q=1\cdot 2\cdot 3\cdot 4\cdot 5\cdot 6\cdot 7\cdot 8\cdot 9\cdot 10=. . .\]
Yes. I lagged.
yeah, but you can also write it as you do with a summation lower limit at the bottom, upper on top
i prefer \[n!=\prod_{\begin{matrix} 1 \leq f \leq n \\f\in\mathbb{Z} \end{matrix} }f=1\cdot 2\cdot 3\cdots n\]
\[ \prod_{n=1}^5\frac{n}{n-1}\]
Why do we have that \(\le\)?
Oh ok that lower and upper thing is a lot more easier.
Zarkon, that's a weebit pedantic. \(f \in \mathbb{Z}\) is implied.
That's how I used to do in summation.
yeah in some circumstances
not always
exactly, it is the same only with products
Not always, no. But in most cases, yes. Particularly elementary ones such as factorials. But, I have to say, there is a weebit of elegance to your definition.
\[n!=\prod_{k=1}^nk\]
I think I get it...... \( \color{Black}{\Rightarrow \Large \prod_{n = 1} ^{10} k}\) Is this to add all numbers between one and ten?
Or maybe you'll put a \(n \epsilon \mathbb{Z} \) too.
Parth, I am using what's basically a notation employed by computer scientist Donald E. Knuth. It is a much superior notation to the delimited form (what Satellite is showing you). It has much easier manipulations. It's a weebit confusing, at first, however. But the two notations are equivalent. The one I'm using, though, is more easily manipulated.
I'm in trouble because I'll have to choose someone to give a medal to :P
If you pick up a copy of Concrete Mathematics, he has an entire chapter dedicated to this. It's an elegant notation.
i have enough, thank you. if i get any more they will take my bike away
ima help u @ParthKohli :u give someone i give the other ;)
Hmm so maybe Limitless is fine. Would you please not mind showing me how to write the product of numbers 1 to 10?
I have already.
Haha I want sat's notation.
limitless is certainly correct about usage and indexing. later you will see infinite products, such as \[\prod_{p\in P} \frac{1}{1-p^{-s}} = \prod_{p\in P} \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} p^{-ns} = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n^s} = \zeta(s) \]
\[\prod_{k=1}^{10}k\]
@Limitless where will I write k \(\epsilon \) \(\mathbb{Z}\)?
you might wan to index over numbers other than integers. the one i wrote above is the riemann zeta function, and the index is over prime numbers
I'll see the page that you linked me to. Thank you @satellite73 @Limitless !!!
Parth, you're getting into another question now.
you dont need \(k\in \mathbb{Z}\) with this notation \[\prod_{k=1}^{10}k\]
Also @Zarkon
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!