Explain why a matrix that does not have the same number of rows and columns cannot have a multiplicative inverse.
i thought it was a rule that inverses can only happen in square matrices lol..hmm
must have something to do with definition -__-
I think it's intuitive. One moment.
Son, take thy time.
@SirIsaacNewton when was the last time you studied Engrish?
I doubt he ever studdied 'Engrish' ;)
My son, I went to my alma mater many centuries back. Therefore, I do not remember.
but i taught Sur Newton was a geneous?
i beleive he studdied on the University of Cambridge
I am a genius, though, I woke up after many centuries.
You have a short term memory problem. you floppy disk is old. The world has change. You should start using some SD cards.
changed*
People, please, write correct. ^^ I'm brazilian, and I seek improve my english in here. rsrsrssr
@jpsmarinho , @SirIsaacNewton can give you some free classes. :D
really?
rssrsr
nobody really answered my question lol
I think that don't have a multiplicative inverse if don't have the same number of rows and collums, because only in this case that have the identity matrix
or I'm incorrect?
The identity matrix is defined as an \(n\) by \(n\) matrix. Therefore, all matrix inverses must also be square.
i did @ChrisParker023 i told you it was by def lol
Zarkon, generalized inverses are not strictly matrix inverses. But thank you for the link, I had forgotten about those.
no kidding :)
Thanks :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!