This is a pretty basic doubt. We say dU (potential energy) = - Force. dx Where it's a dot product. From there, dU = -F.dx *cos(theta) { theta is the angle between F and dx} However, we write F as -dU/dx. Where did the cos(theta) in the dot product vanish?
\(\theta\) vanishes only when \(\theta\)=0 That is cos\(\theta\)=1 that is to say when force and displacement are in same direction, cos\(\theta\) vanishes.
There is a little bit of ambiguity in your question. Writing \[\frac{dU}{dx} = -F \rightarrow dU=-F\cdot dx \] implies that you're working in a one-dimensional system, where vectors are unnecessary. If you're working in multiple spatial dimensions, it would be more appropriate to write \[\vec{\nabla}U = -\vec{F} \rightarrow dU = -\vec{F}\cdot d\vec{r} = -F\cdot dr \cdot \cos(\theta)\] where theta is the angle between the displacement dr and the force F.
You as using the same notation for F, magnitude of force and Fx, component of force along the x-axis. \(\vec F=-\vec{\nabla}U\) means \(F_x=-\Large\frac{\partial U}{\partial x}\) \(F_y=-\Large\frac{\partial U}{\partial y}\) \(F_z=-\Large\frac{\partial U}{\partial z}\)
Oh right. It;s the component. That clears it. THanks a lot. :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!