Solving for a variable. I=nE/nr+R solve this for n.
As this stands, \(n\) is cancelled in the equation.
\[I=\frac{nE}{nr+R}\]?
That's what I was thinking. The problem is I have an answer sheet from the doctor herself. In her infinite wisdom, she says the answer is n= -IR/Ir-E How do you explain that (wish I could, lol).
Has Rhaukus correctly typed the equation?
Yes he has.
\[I{nr+R}={nE}\]\[I{nr+R}-{nE}=0\]\[(Ir-E)n+R=0\]\[(Ir-E)n=-R\]\[n=\frac{-R}{Ir-E}\]
Then \(n\) does not cancel. Multiply by the denominator and separate \(n\) to one side. Then divide.
Rhaukus, you messed up on step one.
Yeah it's kind of a curve ball. I appreciate you guys trying to help me out too, by the way.
I agree that it is a curveball in the sense that it is not the typical situation of "find \(x\)". Also, Rhaukus, your error was minor. You forgot to distribute all of the denominator onto \(n\).
onto \(I\), I should say.
\[I=\frac{nE}{nr+R}\]\[I(nr+R)={nE}\]\[Inr+IR-nE=0\]\[n(Ir-E)+IR=0\]\[n=\frac{-IR}{Ir-E}\]
Yup. Correct.
Yeah, that's it. I will have to remember that one. Thanks.
You can remove the negative. \[n=\frac{-IR}{Ir-E}=\frac{IR}{E-Ir}\] Also, Kash, you don't need to remember this. Just derive it on your own.
Well, what I mean is I need to remember the steps you used. It didn't occur to me to zero out one side and start the problem from there. That was extremely helpful.
are these variables inan electric circuit ?
Oh, yeah! I totally advocate taking little tips and tricks and keeping them in mind. :D
That was flippin' awesome. lol. I didn't even know they had this kind of stuff online. Maybe I can get on board and try to help someone.
I just recommend reading the code of conduct (or at least skimming it) here http://openstudy.com/code-of-conduct . Helping others is greatly encouraged! :D
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!