Hi friends here is the tutorial on Introduction to complex numbers
the general form of a complex number is a + bi ... let me first give u the description of iota ( i ) : Have you ever thought about \(\sqrt{-1} , \sqrt{-2} \) ? These are refferred to as : Imaginary numbers that is who can only be imagined and who dont exist : \[\huge{\sqrt{-1}=i}\] iota has the value \(\sqrt{-1}\) Complex numbers representation : Complex numbers are represented by Z general form of Z = (a+bi) Addition of complex numbers : let a complex number \(Z_1 = a+bi \) and \(Z_2 = c+d i\) \[\large{Z_1+Z_2 = a+bi + c+di = (a+c)+(bi+di) = (a+c)+i(b+c)}\] Note : Real part of a complex number Z is represented by : Re(z) and imaginary part of Z is represented by Im(z) hence we can say that \(Z_1+Z_2=(Re(z_1)+Re(z_2))+i(Im(z_1)+Im(z_2))\) Subtraction Of complex numbers : let us take \(Z_1=a+bi\) and \(Z_2=c+di\) as two complex numbers : \[\large{Z_1-Z_2=(a+bi)-(c+di)}\] \[\large{Z_1-Z_2=(a-c)+i(b-d)}\] we can write it as \[\large{Z_1-Z_2=(Re(Z_1)-Re(Z_2))+i(Im(Z_1)-Im(Z_2))}\] Multiplication of complex numbers : we are taking same complex numbers here also : \[\large{Z_1*Z_2=(a+bi)(c+di)}\] \[\large{Z_1*Z_2=ac+adi+bci+bdi^2}\] \[\large{Z_1*Z_2=(ac-bd)+i(ad+bc)}\] You must have having one question here how did i write \(bdi^2=-bd\) since \(i=\sqrt{-1}\) therefore we can say that \(i^2=(\sqrt{-1})^2\) \(i^2=-1\) hence \(\large{bdi^2=bd(-1)=-bd}\) Divison of complex numbers \[\large{\frac{Z_1}{Z_2}=\frac{(a+bi)}{(c+di)}}\] \[\large{\frac{Z_1}{Z_2}=\frac{(a+bi)(c-di)}{(c+di)(c-di)}}\] \[\large{\frac{Z_1}{Z_2}=\frac{(ac-adi+bci-bdi^2)}{(c^2-di^2)}}\] \[\large{\frac{Z_1}{Z_2}=\frac{(ac+bd)-i(ad-bc)}{c^2+d^2}}\]
Hope this helps u all .. i will post some advanced level of complex numbers tutorial soon
i really love complex nos. really ..so,,a good job done :)
Can I ask a question?
yes ask
Anyway, I asked :P Why is it like this: sqrt{-25} x sqrt{-4} ≠ sqrt{-25 x -4} ≠ sqrt{100} ≠ 10
5i * 2i = 10i^2= - 10 remember ... \(\sqrt{a}*\sqrt{b}=\sqrt{ab}\) is only true for some cases \[i* \sqrt{a}*i*\sqrt{b}=i^2\sqrt{ab}=-1\sqrt{ab}\]
Yes I understand that. But why can't we do in that way....
u can not apply that formula here ... this can only be possible when a and b are +ve or only 1 either a and b are negative. .
And that's the question - why?
let me ask u this question to ask u this 1 : n+1/n+2=0 find n +1=0 , n =-1 ? right ?
Yes
wait .... in that question \[\sqrt{100}=\pm10\]
got it now ?
Hmm... not really... why that + one doesn't work is the question.
um... wait... \(\large \sqrt{100}=10 \) \(\large -\sqrt{100}=-10 \)
Just a minor point: Typically lowercase \(z\) is used, not uppercase.
sorry @Limitless @Callisto what is i * i ?
@mathslover, it's no problem. I just wanted to point that out--it's not a big deal at all. :P
thanks @Limitless btw how is the tutorial ?
I know how to solve it. I'm asking why we can't multiply the - and - to make a positive.
If I turn it into i, I can solve it.
\(\sqrt{-1}*\sqrt{-1}=\sqrt{-1*-1}=\pm\sqrt{1}=\pm1\) + does not satisfy that equation as \((\sqrt{-1})^2=-1\)
really nice..........well done!
hence we have to think about the condition about that ....
thanks @nitz
And that's the problem why it doesn't satisfy when it is the ''correct'' way to do it?
as i said we have to just think about it practically ..
No. Shouldn't we understand the basic concept? Anyone can have a chance to fall into this trap.
yes ..
"Imaginary numbers that is who can only be imagined and who dont exist" Imaginary numbers exist just as much as real numbers. \(i\) technically has two values, \(\sqrt{-1}\) and \(-\sqrt{-1}.\) (This is deduced from \(i^2=-1.\)) The real parts and imaginary parts are formally denoted \(\Re(z)\) and \(\Im(z)\). Typically one expresses the division of two complex numbers as a sum of fractions as follows: \[\frac{z_1}{z_2}=\frac{ac+bd}{c^2+d^2}+i\frac{bc-ad}{c^2+d^2}.\]
@mathslover How does it related to my question?
*relate
mathematics fallacies.. isn't that a fallacy that we are talking abt
@Callisto, \[\sqrt{a}\sqrt{b}=\sqrt{ab} \Leftrightarrow a,b \ge 0\] That is why your method does not work.
that i what i said yupii
............... So, everyone is just telling me that it must be positive but not explaining why
hate to spam but i need help
but i asked u why is i^2=-1 and not 1 do u have any answer ?
@yeababy np ask
okay it's -1 and then?
why it is not 1
so is i^4 = 1
I told you when I just make it into i form, then it's not a question to me anymore. But the first time I solved this question, I forgot to change it into i form and I got that wrong
\[\sqrt{-1} \ ^2 = -1\]
Campbell: Yes. Callisto: The trick where you multiply radicands only technically works for positive numbers.
To be honest, \(\sqrt{a}\sqrt{b}=\sqrt{ab} \Leftrightarrow a,b \ge 0\) is a definition, I think. It's the definition because negatives impose the wrong result. For example, let \(a\) be negative and \(b\) be negative. Following this identity, we have \(\sqrt{a}\sqrt{b}=\sqrt{ab}=\sqrt{|a||b|}\). However, \(\sqrt{a}\sqrt{b}=\sqrt{-|a|}\sqrt{-|b|}=i\sqrt{|a|}i\sqrt{|b}=i^2\sqrt{|a|}\sqrt{|b}=-\sqrt{|a|}\sqrt{|b|}\) Notice that \(-\sqrt{|a|}\sqrt{|b}\ne \sqrt{|a||b|}\) for any \(a,b \in \mathbb{R}.\)
Correction: \[-\sqrt{|a|}\sqrt{|b|}\ne \sqrt{|a||b|}\]
well i think the tutorial that i wanted to show may be not attract as bcz of this disccusion jk :)
Well, it's just a problem I encountered on OS. I know how to get the right answer but don't understand why that was wrong. It's also weird for me that we see a wrong result, so we exclude it and call it as a definition. Honestly, it rather looks like a condition for me. I'm really sorry if the question raised makes your post dull.
Callisto: You must be clear about what context you are working in. You are used to working in the real numbers. In the real numbers, \(\sqrt{-4}\times\sqrt{-25}\) is undefined, because the square root operation is not defined for negative numbers. In the complex numbers, that expression is defined, and it simplifies to -10.
@nbouscal, I was also thinking of that perspective. I wasn't sure if we could argue the point from a field theory perspective.
Yes, obviously, I've forgotten the basic.
You are just using a trick that you learned that you can use, when in fact that trick does not always work. It is like learning to take a derivative by using certain tricks, and then not recognizing that in some cases the tricks don't work because the derivative doesn't exist.
Thanks! @Limitless and @nbouscal
You're welcome, @Callisto!
Top post @all i think the problem with the square roots has something to do with |dw:1340195552555:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!