Second Order ODE \[\cos^2x\frac{\text d^2y}{\text dx^2}=1\]
\[\cos^2x\frac{\text d^2y}{\text dx^2}=1\]\[\frac{\text d^2y}{\text dx^2}=\sec^2x\]\[\iint\text d^2y=\iint\sec^2x\cdot\text dx^2\]\[\int y\cdot\text dy =\int\tan x+c\cdot\text dx\]\[\frac 12y^2=\ln \left|\sec x\right|+cx+d\]
my book has a different answer to this have i missed something?
what the heck does dx^2 mean o-0 ?
\[\cos^2x\frac{\text d y \text dy}{\text dx\text dx}=1\]\[\frac{\text d y \text dy}{\text dx\text dx}=\sec^2x\]\[\iint\text dy\cdot\text dy=\iint\sec^2x\cdot\text dx\cdot\text dx\]\[\int y\cdot\text dy =\int\tan x+c\cdot\text dx\]\[\frac 12y^2=\ln \left|\sec x\right|+cx+d\]
and your answer is right on the RHS, but that 1/2y^2 is wrong
that is an ill-formed way to write it in my opinion I would just take it one step at a time
try differentiating it twice ... if you get the DE then it's correct.
how come the LHS is just \(y\)?
if there is a simpler way what is it/
I would write \[\frac{d^{2}y}{dx^{2}} = \frac{d}{dx}(\frac{dy}{dx})\] Then integrate both sides wrt x
\[\cos^2 xy''=1\]\[\frac{d^2y}{dx^2}=\sec^2x\implies\frac{dy}{dx}=\int\sec^2x dx=\ln|\sec x|+C_1\]seperation of the variables on the second derivative will not give you y, but y' instead
@FoolAroundMath has stated the formality better that I...
oops, got ahead of myself above :/\[\cos^2 xy''=1\]\[\frac{d^2y}{dx^2}=\frac{d^{2}y}{dx^{2}} = \frac{d}{dx}(\frac{dy}{dx})=\sec^2x\implies\frac{dy}{dx}=\int\sec^2 x dx=\tan x+C_1\]separate the variables again\[y=\int\tan x+C_1dx=\ln|\sec x|+C_1x+C_2\]
@FoolAroundMath 's notation should make it more clear why we don't get 1/2y^2 on the LHS
wolf says correct http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=y%27%27+-+sec^2x+%3D+0
\[\cos^2x\frac{\text d^2y}{\text dx^2}=1\] \[\frac{\text d^2y}{\text dx^2}=\sec^2x\]\[\frac{\text dy}{\text dx}=\int\sec^2x\cdot\text dx\]\[y =\int\tan x+c\cdot\text dx\]\[=\ln \left|\sec x\right|+cx+d\]
right, and as I mentioned I think @FoolAroundMath 's notation makes the process even more clear
a \(\text d\) magically melts away
no it doesn't, watch closely...
\[\cos^2x\frac{\text d^2y}{\text dx^2}=1\]\[\frac{\text d^2y}{\text dx^2}=\frac d{dx}\left(\frac{dy}{dx}\right)=\sec^2x\]\[\int d\left(\frac{dy}{dx}\right)=\int\sec^2x dx\]\[\frac{dy}{dx}=\tan x+C_1\]\[\int dy=\int \tan x+C_1dx\]\[y=\ln|\sec x|+C_1x+C_2\]
notice that by utilizing the notation in the second line it becomes clear that separation of variables is being applied as usual
I have to wait for this to sink in \[\int \text d\left(\frac{\text dy}{\text dx}\right)=\frac{\text dy }{\text dx}\]
let\[u=\frac{dy}{dx}\]is not\[\int du=u+C\]?
we could write this whole thing subbing u for dy/dx
it make perfect sense with a subsitution \[\int \text du=u+c\]
yeah it just took a while to get it
I'm just learning a lot watching this debate ^_^ Perhaps a tutorial on the proper syntax usage for all these \(\frac{d^2x}{dx^2}\) & \(\frac{d}{dx}\) & dx types of things would be in order? (gives @FoolAroundMath a medal for helping out too)
does\[\iint \text d^2y=y\]
+c
yeah, I learned from the user JamesJ (an actual professor), that \[\int\int d^2y\]actually has no meaning it's undefined, and is what is called an ill-formed expression
oh,
along with\[\int\int(dx)^2;~~~\int\int dxdx\]and other things like that in short, you do have to be very careful with the notation in cases like this
why is that ?
well, what would it mean? nobody has given it one
if you want to invent a meaning for those expressions above, that's fine, but it won't give you the right answer to your ODE in the way that you have chosen to define it
it would have worked if \[\iint \text d^2y=y\]
but you have to analyze what \(d^2y\) means is it \(d(dy)\) ?
yes
oh it could be dydy
i see the confusion
this is pushing the boundary of my knowledge, but I know for sure that dydy is an ill-formed expression as far as d^2y=d(dy) I'm not sure about that, but if so I guess that would mean that\[\int\int d^2y=\int\int d(dy)=\int dy=y+C\]but then what do you do with \[dx^2\]? is that\[dx^2=d(dx)\]I don't think that works...
\[\int f(x)dx^2;~~~~~\int\int f(x)dx^2\]don't mean anything to me
\[\text d^2w=\text d\cdot\text dw\] \[\text dw^2=\text dw\cdot\text dw\]
$$dx^2 \text{ looks more like } d(x^2) = du \text{ under substitution } u =x^2$$
@UnkleRhaukus those definitions I suppose make your ODE come out right, so go ahead and use them I guess. I don't know if those are generally accepted by the mathematical community either way, you see how that by defining \(d^2y=d(dy)\) <_(I really think this one should have parentheses to show that d(dy) is the differential of the differential, and no some multiplication) and as I said, I'mm pretty sure that there is some mathematical subtly sin committed by writing\[\int\int f(x)dxdx\]but I am still a student, and would need clarification as to why that is the case
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/21199/is-dy-dx-not-a-ratio i guess this would help
better perhaps if we could find an entry on the possibility of using dxdx for dA in a double integral
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!