consider the plane -x+4y+2z+6=0 a) determine a normal vector,n to the plane b) determine the coordinates of two points ,s and t, on the plane c)determine st d)show that st is perpendicular to n
please help
take the gradient of the equation for the plane do you know how to do that?
no
do you know how to do cross products?
no
...that will make this difficult do you know how to take a partial derivative?
dervative i think so
do you know how to find the determinant of a matrix?
no havent studied that
its calculus 12
ok, I'm gonna try to do this the only way I know how what is the partial derivative of the function for the plane with respect to x ?
ok
is it -1+4+2=0
?
in vector form, yes -i+4j+2k
that is the gradient, so you apparently do know how to take it after all
you realise that the partial with respect to x is just -1 you did \(f_x\hat i+f_y\hat j+f_z\hat k\)
the gradient of a function is\[\nabla f=f_x\hat i+f_y\hat j+f_z\hat k\]
that is a vector that is perpendicular to the surface so the vector you want is\[\nabla f(x,y,z)=\vec n=\langle-1,4,2\rangle\]
aha
so how do i determine the coordinates of s and t on plane
well, unless you did not provide some info, you just need to pick any two points in the plane you can do that by just plugging in numbers for example, let x=0, y=0, then you can figure out what z is do that and get two points
aha but the quwstion doesnt have any graphs
so just pick two random points in the plane
aha
so for t i do the same?
yes, we need to get the coordinates of any two points so we can get a vector in the plane we are then going to prove that that vector is perpendicular to \(\vec n\) for part c)
aha
so point s is (1,2,-6.5)
t is (2,3,-8)
if x=1 and y=2 I get z=-0.5 try to pick whole numbers though if you can x=0, y=0 are obvious choices; or letting any two variables be zero, then finding the third
oh k thx
the (2,3,-8) works just fine though, don't get me wrong
yea nvm
ah you were right about the other point so you want to use s is (1,2,-6.5) and t is (2,3,-8) ??? can you form a vector between them?
yea st= t-s i guess
yep
i got (1,1,-14,5)
-14.5
-8-(-6.5)=-1.5
so how do we find st perpendicular to n
oh my bad
what do you know about the dot product of two perpendicular vectors?
d.m=0 so d is perpendicular to n
yes
so we use st to find d?
the last part just asks us to confirm that the vector st it perpendicular to \(\vec n\) so dot them, and if it comes out to be zero we have proved that they are perpendicular
so in this case st.n=0
it should, let's check
\[\vec{st}\cdot\vec n=\langle1,1,-1.5\rangle\cdot\langle-1,4,2\rangle\]
i got [-1,4,-3]
careful, dot products are scalar\[\vec{st}\cdot\vec n=\langle1,1,-1.5\rangle\cdot\langle-1,4,2\rangle=-1+4-3=0\]
aha
it matchs
cool how even those random points you chose prove our theorem it always matches, or else math fails :)
yea i think so thx for your help very much
welcome :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!