I have heard that \(\log x\) is actually supposed to be \(\ln x\). I don't think that's true.
Because ln is different, and log base 10 is different.
log to the base e is ln \[\log_e x =\ln x\]
Yeah, I knew it :D
Now I'd accuse him for confusing me ;)
and log x is not necessarily 10, the base can be anything greater than 0 but not 1 \[\log_b a,\ b>0, b\ne 1\]
lnx = 2.303log(10)x
Yeah @UnkleRhaukus you meant \(\ln x = \log _e x\) :P
yeah i did,
But log x is supposed to be \(\log _{10} x\), when the base is not given
for an unspecified base i would assume base 10
Yep :)
unless when using Wolfram
Wolfram gets confused lol
It's the properties of log, you can use any base as long you don't have it specified. Most of the log tables are either to base 10 or e
But an unspecified base is def. 10
Nope, that's not necessary. Because base 10 is common, we use it mostly
If base is not given, then it is assumed as Log having 10 base...
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!