Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 23 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

show the n^5 - n is divisible by 3 for all integers n

OpenStudy (anonymous):

please help! :)

Parth (parthkohli):

Let's try to factor n^5 - n. I get (n - 1)n(n + 1)(n^2 + 1)

Parth (parthkohli):

One in three consecutive integers MUST be divisible by 3.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

im sorry i dont get the first equation but i get ur 2nd comment

Parth (parthkohli):

Do you know factoring? Just try a calculator or something

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so basically you've factorised it again and again?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so the first factorisation is n(n^4 - 1)?

Parth (parthkohli):

\(\Rightarrow n(n^4 - 1) \) \(\Rightarrow n( (n - 1) (n^3 + 3n^2 + 3^2n + 1)) \)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yep :) i got that

Parth (parthkohli):

But I want to cut down what I am explaining you. Leave the factorization for a while.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok

Parth (parthkohli):

Yay! Now, if you notice, one in three consecutive integers can be divided by 3.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yep

Parth (parthkohli):

See how there's this thing (n - 1)n(n + 1)?? So that means we are multiplying three consecutive integers.

Parth (parthkohli):

That means that it is divisible by 3, as we can divide one of them and we get a proper quotient :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

wait sorry just a minute :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

where did u get (n - 1)n(n + 1) from again? it is factorisation?

Parth (parthkohli):

Yeah ^^^ see there... the factorization

Parth (parthkohli):

The factored form is (n - 1)n(n + 1)(n^2 + 1), but if we focus on (n - 1)n(n + 1) we see three consecutive integers.. and see the rest that I explained.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ohh i get it so if say n is 3 than its 2, 3, and 4?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

thanks :) i get it now..but what do i do now that i have that?

Parth (parthkohli):

Yeah, so 3 is divisible by 3 right? :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

in the answer i just say the because of this factorisation it is divisible by 3

Parth (parthkohli):

(2)(3)(4)(10) = 240 a proof.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yep i get that 3 is divisible by 3

Parth (parthkohli):

No.. it is because (n - 1)(n)(n + 1) signifies the multiplication of 3 consecutive integers, and one in three consecutive integers is divisible by 3 =)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ahhhh so the actually factorisation is ^^^ and when u substitute n with a number say 3 then u get a number that is divisible by 3 right?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

actual*

Parth (parthkohli):

No, proofs don't involve trying it with numbers, as proofs may have exceptions.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ohh okay

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so for the answer i can put the equation n^5 - n then i put the factorised bits (n - 1)n(n + 1)(n^2 + 1) and then i say that because they are consecutive they are divisible by 3?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but just one thing..if there are 3 consecutive integers (n - 1)(n)(n + 1) how is it one in three consecutive integers is divisible by 3?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

would this deal with .... forgot the name of it ...

OpenStudy (amistre64):

if its true for k, then its assume its true for k+1 etc

OpenStudy (anonymous):

induction right? yea i dont get that... lol :)

OpenStudy (amistre64):

induction :) thats what i was thinking

OpenStudy (anonymous):

can u explain induction to me?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

or is what i was doing before right>

OpenStudy (amistre64):

n^5 - n there is nothing obvious that would make this go bad for integers; so lets set up a few basis cases dunno if the prior method was viable or not

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok..so what do i do? im sorry im soo stuck... :P

OpenStudy (amistre64):

0^5 - 0 = 0 ; 0/3 is good 1^5 - 1 = 0 ; 0/3 is good 2^5 - 2 = 30; 30/3 is good assume its good for k k^5 - k is divisible by 3 is the assumption from the basis

OpenStudy (amistre64):

hmm, what to do next

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oh ok i get that..k is just a random letter replacing n

OpenStudy (amistre64):

correct

OpenStudy (amistre64):

next we would change k to k+1 and work it out

OpenStudy (anonymous):

okay so it wud be (k + 1)^5 - (k+1)?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

yes

OpenStudy (amistre64):

now to deduce of thats divisible by 3 :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok so how do i do that :P

OpenStudy (amistre64):

cant recall excatly, but id prolly start by expanding the whole thing

Parth (parthkohli):

Woah woah.. we have already proved the existence of the formula in n ;)

Parth (parthkohli):

1^5 - 1 = 1 - 1 = 0 that is divisible by 3.

Parth (parthkohli):

And then we just deduced it for n.. and we can just in the same way deduce for n + 1

OpenStudy (anonymous):

:P yea u have lol but i dont get how its to do with one in three consecutive integers is divisible by 3

Parth (parthkohli):

Where don't you understand?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

k^5 + 5k^4 + 10k^3 + 10k^2 +5k + 1 - k - 1 k^5 + 5k^4 + 10k^3 + 10k^2 +5k - k k^5 + 5k^4 + 10k^3 + 10k^2 + 4k hmmm

Parth (parthkohli):

If n is divisible by 3, then the quotient is (n + 1)(n - 1)(n^2 + 1) If n + 1 is divisible by 3, then the quotient is n(n - 1)(n^2 + 1).. If n - 1 is divisible by 3, then the quotient is n(n + 1)(n^2 + 1) You can even try out the Polynomial Remainder theorem, and you'd see that it has no remainder in all three cases.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ohh okay thanks :)

OpenStudy (amistre64):

i believe parth has it, but i cant recall too well if thats adequate for the induction or not :/

Parth (parthkohli):

Both work

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I GOT IT NOW!! u guys are awesome! :D

OpenStudy (anonymous):

im kinda slow :P

OpenStudy (amistre64):

:) good luck

Parth (parthkohli):

lol

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i got it by substituting the n in n(n - 1)(n + 1)(n^2 + 1) by 2 and then getting 30 which id divisible by 3

OpenStudy (amistre64):

if 2 numbers are divisible by 3; then the sum is also divisible by 3 ....

OpenStudy (amistre64):

that is what i was thinking :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so i prove it with 2 numbers than it works with all numbers yay!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

iv been stuck on that question for 3 hours :P

OpenStudy (amistre64):

prove it with a basis case; then assume it works for all cases of "k"; then add (k+1) to both sides and algebra it into submission is the usual induction steps that I recall

OpenStudy (amistre64):

i was stuck changing a flat tire for like 3 hours :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

hahah welll its 11:30 and i have school tomorrow so i better go to sleep :) thanks for ur help!

OpenStudy (amistre64):

yw, and again ... good luck

OpenStudy (anonymous):

thanks :)

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!