how does \( \vec D = \epsilon_0 \vec E \) give flux density?
I am not sure to understand the question. Flux of \(\vec D\) equals charge enclosed in the surface.
Mass density(or just density for most people) is mass per volume. The per clues you that you need to multiply by volume to get the mass. D is the flux per area through a surface. Again the per is the clue that you have to multiply by an area to get the flux. Here things are a little more complex because the answer depends on the orientation of the surface, but the basic idea is the same.
Total flux = \( Q \over \epsilon_0\) \[ \oint_s \vec E \cdot \hat n dS = \iiint _v \nabla \cdot \vec E dV = \iiint_v {\rho \over \epsilon_0} dV \\ \implies \nabla \cdot \vec E = { \rho \over \epsilon _0} ,\\ \implies \nabla \cdot \epsilon _0\vec E = { \rho } \\ \implies \nabla \cdot \vec D = \rho\] Wikipedia says "In free space, the electric displacement field is equivalent to flux density" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_displacement_field how can \( \vec D \) be flux density?
|dw:1341618283951:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!