has anbody taken flvs geometry in here???

Question

lgbasallote · Answer

i have taken geometry does that count?

cwrw238 · Answer

flvs geometry?

anonymous · Answer

yes i need help with a problem but no one seems to know how to do it

lgbasallote · Answer

why does it have to be specifically someone who has taken flvs geometry? after all according to the law of multiple proportions, flvs geometry is just the same as my and other people's geometry..

anonymous · Answer

oh okay do u think u can help?

lgbasallote · Answer

hmm show me

anonymous · Answer

ok

anonymous · Answer

attachment

anonymous · Answer

there two separate questions

cwrw238 · Answer

i can't read your doc

anonymous · Answer

k hold on ill post it up

lgbasallote · Answer

soooo who's taking flvs geometry again? lol jk

cwrw238 · Answer

i wonder what flvs stand for?

anonymous · Answer

Since you're looking to prove using side-side-side, your best bet is to pick the option where you have sides in the answer (that's for question 1)

lgbasallote · Answer

yeah this can definitely be solved by anyone who has studied geometry..not just flvs geometry...however most of us tend to forget proving after we're through with it heh

lgbasallote · Answer

flvs is some sort of online school i believe

cwrw238 · Answer

oh ok

anonymous · Answer

Which fact could you use to help prove that ΔABDΔACB using Side-Side-Side? 
∠ACB ≅ ∠DBA 
∠BAC + ∠BCA  = 90˚ 
DB over AD = BC over AB 
AD congruent to CB

anonymous · Answer

im lost wat would the answer be???

anonymous · Answer

For question 1, the second answer tells you that at least 2 sides are proportionnal, which is a very good start in the direction of S-S-S. I mean, you'd still need to prove that the 3rd side is proportionnal for a full proof, but that one is one of the steps (which is what they seem to want.

anonymous · Answer

For question 2, it looks a lot harder than it actually is. You don't need to go any further than the first 3 lines. If in the figure you're looking at all 3 statements are true, then you're all set! For example, we know it won't be figure 1 because AB and AC are not perpendicular.

anonymous · Answer

so the answer would be the first one?

anonymous · Answer

No, since the first given statement is not true in that figure (AB is not perpendicular to AC)