The first (ΔiH1) and the second (ΔiH) ionization enthalpies (in kJ mol–1) of a few elements are given below: Elements ΔiH1 ΔiH2 I 2372 5251 II 520 7300 III 900 1760 IV 1680 3380 Which of the above elements is likely to be : (a) the most reactive metal. (b) the most reactive non-metal. (d) Noble gas.
Noble gases are the least reactive, that is, they do not like any change in their electronic configuration - so their first ionisation enthalpy would be remarkably higher than the rest.
I -d
is it 520 7300
but reactive metals also have 1 or 2 valance eletron
so it need lees ionization energy
so it can be reactive metal tooo
ionization enthalpies - it is the min amt of energy req to remove the electron
so hw it can be used to gain electron
OH NO! GODDAMN ME!!!! O.O I have been thinking along the lines of electron gain enthalpy all along.. Damn me! I am so so RUSTY!!!!!! I am sorry for the mix up, I am posting a revised solution in a jiffy..
ok...
Okay so, again for the noble gas, a huge amount of energy would be required to remove an electron from its stable electronic configuration. (Much greater than in comparison with a metal or a non metal)
As for a metal, the most-reactive metal would be one with the minimum possible no. of electrons in its valence shell, so losing an electron would be favorable. Hence the first ionisation energy would be pretty lo comparatively. But now as the atom attains a stable state after losing one electron, losing a second electron would be extremely unfavorable for its configuration, and so the second IE would be exceptionally high for compared to the first IP.
so noble gas = element 1
Yes, that's correct.
the most reactive metal = ?
Think.. I've provided all the explanations and hints..
sorry i have nt seen that let me read
the most reactive metal = element 2
@apoorvk
Yeah, that's right as well!
then the most reactive non-metal.
okay this one hmm - a non-metal has a incomplete octet requiring 1,2, or 3 more electrons. A very reactive one would be an atom that needs just one more electron and would be 'aching' for it - so now, removing an electron would be detrimental to its 'dreams' of achieving the octet :P So, if you think, it's first IP would be pretty high (though not as high as that for the noble gas), and ofcourse, the consecutive IPs would be pretty high as well! So, any ideas? ;)
is it element 4
Aye aye! correct-o! So you think you've understood the fundae behind this?
yup thxxxx !! hey can u prove cos(x+y) = cosx.coy - sinx . siny
Hmm, post it in the maths section please, I'll try!
ok
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!