A question about the Bell Curve
\[e ^{-0.5(x-\mu)^2/\sigma^2}/\sigma \sqrt{2 \pi}\] \[e ^{0.5(-(x-\mu)^2/\sigma^2)}/\sigma \sqrt{2 \pi}\] \[e ^{i(x-\mu)/\sigma}/\sigma \sqrt{2 \pi}\] \[(cos(x-\mu/\sigma)+isin(x-\mu/\sigma))/\sigma \sqrt{2 \pi}\]
The last equation graphs nothing like the first, and I can't see why, as they should be the same thing.
how did u get the third equation from the second one ? why there is iota there ?
^0.5 is the square root
\[\sqrt{-1}\sqrt{(x-\mu)^2}/\sqrt{\sigma^2}\]
WHat's the question here?
The first equation is the bell curve, but the second seems periodic, it will yield a completely different graph. How is this?
I guess you are confused by the 0.5 in your starting formula. If you write it in the form: \[1/(\sigma \sqrt{2\pi} ) \times e ^{-[(x-\mu)/(\sigma \sqrt{2} )]^2} \] and use \[i ^{2} = -1 \] like you suggested, you get: \[1/(\sigma \sqrt{2\pi} ) \times e ^{[i^{2}(x-\mu)/(\sigma \sqrt{2} )]^2} \] This is just another way of writing the bell formula. I fact it is a non-periodic real function.
You start with \[ e ^{0.5(-(x-\mu)^2/\sigma^2)}/\sigma \sqrt{2 \pi} \] and then re-write the 0.5 in the exponent as a square root. But notice that the square root is around \( e^{stuff} \) and not around \(stuff\) that is, the next step is \[ \sqrt{e ^{(-(x-\mu)^2/\sigma^2)}}/\sigma \sqrt{2 \pi} \] which is different than what you posted.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!