find the general solution \[(4 \text D^4 - 8\text D^3 - 7\text D^2 + 11 \text D + 6) y = 0\]
\[x=-1,x=-1/2,x=3/2,x=2?\]
wow fourth order DE...
uhmm could you explain @gracemere
Rational root theorem says \( \pm \frac{6,3,2,1}{4,2,1} \) are only possible roots for \( 4D^4-8D^3-7D^2+11D+6=0\)
rational root?
only possible rational roots***
\[4m^4-8m^3-7m^2+6m=0\]
they're using auxilaries to solve it, @mukushla
remind me what rational root theorem is @mukushla
@lgbasallote i mean*
@lgbasallote , the rational roots theorem is a theorem applying to polynomial factorization and root finding. You use it to tell if a given polynomial expression has rational roots, and which rational roots it might be.
Useful here because we are trying to factor this quartic polynomial into something more managable. Trust me, it's better than solving the quartic with a formula. That's just plain nasty.
isnt there any other way besides rational root theorem? i dont want to rely on a method i can barely remember
Well igbiw, there really isn't. You should know the rational roots theorem.
There is another way, which is solving that quartic polynomial. However, I can tell you that it will take you at least ten times as long to do that then t just learn the rational roots theorem and apply it.
so this needs to be factored out right? to get m
to get your m's yes
and there are 2 positive roots here right..
Rational roots theorem is the way to go for this job. Only when you have determined that the roots are not rational do you try to do something like a cubic or quartic formula. Even then, you will usually be able to take out one root and make the job a whole lot easier.
\[y=k _{1}e^{-x/2}+k_{2}e^{3x/2}+k_{3}e^{-x}+k_{4}e^{2x}\] 4(x-2)(x+1)(x-3/2)(x+1/2)
then 3 negative roots
@Herp_Derp what the heck just happened o.O
What do you mean? I solved it.
i dont see a solution anywhere
he solved it lgba
if you could tell me how you came up with that with no solution i would be glad to hear it. i believe it can aid me a lot
lgba, are you taking DE right now or trying to learn it?
taking it
by yourself
so do you know auxilary equations and how they work.
depends what does that mean?
im not good in remembering fancy words
when you switch to m and solve for the roots
ahh yes i am familiar
Well, observe that x=2 is a solution to 4x^4-8x^3-7x^2+11x+6 (For example, look at its graph, conjecture that 2 is a solution, then prove it). Then use polynomial long division to divide that out.
Then repeat, and you have a quadratic.
howd you know x = 2 would be a solution?
I told you, I looked at a graph. (Calculator). It's a perfectly legit method, as long as you plug it back in to prove that it's a zero.
well we are not allowed to use a calculator so i need another way to find the roots
Rational zeroes test is the only way
rational zero test? what's that?
rational roots theorem igbiw. just learn it.
it's a way of finding all possible roots
and then you use synthetic division to check each possible
it's required material for algebra two. and correction, @Outkast3r09 , it is not a way. It is a way of finding all the *rational* roots
All Possible, not every single way is a possible root
well i learned rational theorem long ago but i dont recall it anymore
Wrong. the root could be irrational. In that case, you would need incredible insight or the quartic/cubic/quadratic/linear equation depending on how many roots you already know.
can you demonstrate the rational theorem in this problem?
yes but i'm saying that the rational roots theorem will find all POSSIBLE rational roots of the equation
i'm not saying that there isn't a complex root within the equation
*ahem* someone asking for help here...
Yes, that's what I meant outkast. I thought you had implied that it would give you all the solutions (including the irrational ones). Nevermind then.
Igbiw, this is algebra two...
your point being?
Well, I forgot it too. xD
i dont need to see a wiki page -_- just show me a demonstration and i'll be able to get it
The wikipage SHOWS you a demonstration.
wiki loves overcomplicating things...
Besides, if you are going to be solving DE's like this one, you will need to know this theorem well. You aren't going to cut it just skimming the material, because you will need to use it a lot.
exactly why i need to see a demo :)
There. Two demos.
they say he who keeps posting links is he who knows not the answer lol
Btw, I don't even know how to solve DEs. But I do know how to solve polynomials. hahahaha
ill read the purplemath thing
Igbiw, you need to learn the material well. It's not a good idea getting someone to explain it real-time, then just consulting sources.
*than
just one question though...is it possible to find zeroes using derivatives or something?
Well, I'm pretty sure you can use calculus to aid yourself, but I'm more sure that it won't make it easier, seeing as I have yet to find calculus aided solutions of the quartic. You can find ones for cubics that have one real solution, as well as quadratics.
No, in general Newton's method would not converge. You would have to guess so well that you might as well have already known the solution.
Higher order polynomials have been proved unsolvable with a single formula involving a finite amount of radicals apparently. if you see a quintic or above, you are better off approximating or using the rational roots theorem.
maybe take the derivative until there is only a quadratic equation
Igbiw, how would that help you?
i do not know
And herp, you sure the newton-raphson method doesn't converge? Whatabout the picard?
uhmm okay i guess i'll just study rational roots theorem =_=
Yup. It's much faster. ^^ also note that approximation solutions are not really necessary usually if you have determined that it has a rational root.
@inkyvoyd the Newton method *could* converge, if x0 was close enough, but in general it would not. I am not familiar with how Picard's method is used to approximate roots of polynomials. Perhaps you are talking about a different method than I am thinking: http://www.math.tamu.edu/~mpilant/math308H/Projects/PicardMethod.pdf
Hm. I got the method from my textbook, which I would consult, but it is late and I have to go to bed. Uhh, you might have it, it's "calculus and analytic geometry" http://www.amazon.com/Calculus-Analytic-Geometry-9th-Edition/dp/0201531747 . I think I have like edition 6 on paper, and I have the 9th on ebook. Note that I'm actually still learning most of the material. But yeah.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!