Ask your own question, for FREE!
Biology 15 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Scientific evidence indicates that H. erectus were the first hominids to emigrate from Africa. Which of the following would most likely bring the reliability of this information into question?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

What are the choices for the test?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

DNA analysis showing H. erectus and modern humans did not have a common evolutionary ancestor An archaeological dig finding fossil remains of A. africanus in Europe and Asia Finding tools used by H. erectus in continents other than Africa A discovery of fossils of H. erectus showing that they walked upright

OpenStudy (anonymous):

C because the others really have nothing to do with it c:

OpenStudy (anonymous):

okay that was what i was leaning towards, thank you!!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I took this test 2 months ago^^

OpenStudy (anonymous):

no problem!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

do you know this one? Although most gray squirrels have gray fur, sometimes individuals with white or black fur are born. If a white-furred individual were born in a population of gray squirrels living in a Florida forest, what would be the most likely long-term consequence of its presence for the squirrel population if the forest remained unchanged for the next several generations?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The population would very quickly become predominantly white since the white squirrels would be camouflaged against the sand. The number of white squirrels in the population would slowly increase as the original white squirrel produced white offspring. The population would remain primarily gray, and the white squirrel would likely get eaten prior to adulthood. The white squirrel would draw more predators to the area since it was more visible, and many gray squirrels would get eaten.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

C because thats the only one that relates to the information given^^

OpenStudy (anonymous):

alright thanks! this stuff confuses me! haha

OpenStudy (anonymous):

No problem^^ glad to help!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

would you mind another question? haha sorry i dont wanna bother!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Oh no problem^^ I'm procrastinating today anywais!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Darwin noticed differences in the beak shapes of finches on the various islands of the Galapagos and surmised that they all might have evolved from a common ancestor on the mainland. If Darwin had known about molecular biology, a field of study that did not exist at the time he lived, how might he have used it to test his hypothesis?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

He could have done DNA tests on the birds to see how closely they were related. He could have checked to see if they shared similar cellular structures indicating their common ancestry. He could have used modern tools to make more accurate measurements of beak shape and size. He could have genetically engineered finches with extreme beak shapes to see how they survived.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

A that would be the most efficient way of determining relation^^

OpenStudy (anonymous):

THANK YOU! could i ask another? loll sorry :p

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Not a problem! ASK AWAYYY! :DD

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Scientific evidence, including the ability to determine the age of rocks, has led to the discovery that Earth’s continents were once one land mass that has since been separated. Which of the following best describes how this discovery might be useful in understanding evolutionary theory?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

It showed how mountains could form a barrier that would be difficult for organisms to cross. It explained what makes the continents drift around and isolate the organisms living on them. It provided a set of rocks of known age to which others in different places could be compared. It suggested that more recently evolved organisms might be found in the oldest rocks.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

B the others are basically COMPLETELY unrelated to the topic.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i dont understand this question because the lesson confused me : Each of the following answer choices compares a segment of DNA from two related species that diverged from a common ancestor. Assume a mutation rate of two mutations per 60 million years applies to all segments and that a mutation can happen only once at each position in a DNA sequence. Which pair of sequences shows that the two species diverged from their last common ancestor 60 million years ago?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

TATTCGCG and TGTCTGCA GCGCTTAT and ACGTTTGT GATTCACT and AACTCACT TCACTTAA and TCACTCAA

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Okay I admit I do NOT remember learning this...hmm one second let me check the website.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

okay thanks its in 5.03

OpenStudy (anonymous):

is it honors??

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes

OpenStudy (anonymous):

That would make sense okay one second

OpenStudy (anonymous):

okay!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

It would be A I'm like 89% sure but let me go over it again

OpenStudy (anonymous):

alright!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

hmmm it might be the one with 3 changes in it though...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Go with B!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

okay i will! thank you! Ready for another? lol

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yeh sure^^

OpenStudy (anonymous):

A small population of 100 deer has become established on an island that is usually inaccessible from the mainland. Over time a recessive trait for white fur color has become common among them. Of the 100 deer, 64 have white fur. After the young are born the next year, the frequency of the white allele in the population increased to 81%. How has the frequency of the white allele changed between the two generations, and what is most likely to happen to the brown allele in future generations?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The white allele has increased by 17 percent, and it will likely outcompete the brown allele soon since natural selection favors it. The white allele has increased by 10 percent, but the brown allele will probably start increasing in future generations since it is dominant. The white allele has increased by 10 percent, and it is possible the brown allele could be lost to genetic drift or nonrandom mating. The white allele has increased by 17 percent, but it may or may not continue to increase depending on future mating combinations.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

A. That ones easy because obviously white is doing better and it increased 17% the area is probably more white then brown so brown will die off

OpenStudy (anonymous):

okay! greatttttt another one of those sequence questions! :( The mitochondrial DNA sequence that is shared by two species has a steady mutation rate. Scientists determine the sequences of these two species to be as follows: Species A: CAGGCCATTATG Species B: CCAGCCTATAGG This DNA sequence has a known mutation rate, which the scientists used to calculate that the species diverged from a common ancestor 80 million years ago. Using this information, how much more time do you predict will pass before these species differ by a total of eight base pairs?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

160 million years 32 million years 48 million years 240 million years

OpenStudy (anonymous):

48.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

NO!! one second

OpenStudy (anonymous):

okay!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

say 170

OpenStudy (anonymous):

that isnt an option though

OpenStudy (anonymous):

er 160

OpenStudy (anonymous):

okay! sorry i am almost done. just wanna make sure i am right! Lamarck noticed that giraffes used their extremely long necks to reach the leaves high up on acacia trees, which other animals could not reach, giving them a food source for which they had few competitors. In developing his theory about natural selection, what did Lamarck infer from this observation?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Giraffe necks would get longer over a lifetime of stretching, and their offspring would inherit the longer necks of their parents. All giraffes were born with short necks, but eating acacia leaves would cause them to stretch over a lifetime. The first giraffe to evolve had a long neck and passed the trait to its offspring with no further change in the species since. Only the giraffes with the longest necks would survive and be able to produce offspring.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

D I know thats the only choice because the others are nonsensical

OpenStudy (anonymous):

forgot to press post XD

OpenStudy (anonymous):

haha okay! Which of the following can be inferred from the differences between the skulls of Australopithecus afarensis and Homo neaderthalensis?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Australopithecus afarensis had a longer skull than Homo neaderthalensis and was the first hominid to create tools. Australopithecus afarensis had a more pronounced nose than Homo neanderthalensis, suited to breathing cold air. Homo neaderthalensis was taller than Australopithecus afarensis and was able to walk upright first. Homo neaderthalensis had a larger cranial capacity than Australopithecus afarensis and had a larger brain.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

One second I have this in my notes

OpenStudy (anonymous):

okay

OpenStudy (anonymous):

C because I can rule the others out based on their typical behaviors listed in my notes.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

okay! two more haha :p Which of the following best explains a way that a molecular clock can be used?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The number of DNA mutations in an organism is measured over time to determine how long it will take for a new species to evolve. The number of DNA mutations in a species is compared to the number of DNA mutations in another species to determine the relative amount of time each species has been evolving. The number of differences in a specific DNA sequence of two species is multiplied by a known mutation rate to determine the number of years of evolution that separate the two species. The number of differences in the DNA sequences of two organisms of the same species is averaged to determine how many years of evolution have occurred.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

B or C which one do you think would make more sense based on what you know?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

umm b, is that right?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Good job^^

OpenStudy (anonymous):

thanks! :D last one! Based on fossilized evidence, there are scientific claims made about the evolution of certain species. If a scientist studying the fossils of a specific species had a hypothesis other than what was currently accepted, what steps should be taken to have the alternative hypothesis considered

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Since the original hypothesis is untestable given the circumstances, another one is more likely to be correct. If an alternative hypothesis sounds plausible it could be used in place of the original hypothesis. The scientist should publish the alternative hypothesis in a popular magazine to gain public support. It is useful to test alternative hypotheses and know that they are incorrect.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

B I'm pretty sure because C is the only other plausible one and they told us that was never a good choice so B.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

alright thanks for all the help!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

No problem! sorry if you get a bad grade D:

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i got a 20/40. some i did on my own so i will retake the test later!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yeah I never do good on those tests v.v but I have an 87 and I'm finishing this week :D

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!