Prove by mathematical Inducttion: \( 10^{(n+1)} + 3.4^{(n-1)} +5 \) is divisible by 9
10^{(n + 1)} That'd work :)
okkkk thanks u r awesosme parth
Let's start with 1. \( \color{Black}{\Rightarrow 10^{2} + 3.4^{0} + 5 }\) \( \color{Black}{\Rightarrow 100 + 1 + 5 }\) \( \color{Black}{\Rightarrow 106}\)
Ya its not divisible by 9 so i guesss its not true
Never heard that 106 was divisible by 9.
Pretty sure 106 is not divisible by nine.
The way the question is phrased seems like these statemnets must be true but who knows
The question should have said - "Disprove by Mathematical Induction". Heh!
curious, what book are you using for these induction problems?
It says use the PMI to prove the following for all natural numbers
lol, 1 is also a natural number :P
A transition to advanced mathematics By douglas smith, Maurice eggen and Richard St andre
'advanced mathematics' is an overstatement.
maybe its \( 10^{n+1}+3 * 4^{n-1}+5 \) ????
YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
I knew that the statement had to be true. ALRIGHTY THANKS
I am trying to solve it but i cant obviously
like how wld u prove its true for (n+1)?
can you show it is true for n=0 (that is the first step, prove true for the "base case")
umm well its all natural numbers so it n=1 10^2+3*4^0 +5 = 108 and 9 divides 108
ok, now assume it is true for all cases up to n is it true for n+1? replace n with n+1 in the equation, what do you get?
\( 10^ {(n+2)} + 3*4^n +5 \)
Like i am not sure how I am suppossed to show that this is divisible by 9
right now I am waiting for an idea to show up.
hahahahahahahah
10^n = 1 mod 9
I have learnt modulus but not in this course yet. like that is next chapter but i guess we can use ittttttttttt
exp that is helpful this may not be the fastest way, but we could group like this 10*10^(n+1) + 4*3*4^(n-1) +5 6*10^(n+1) + 4*10^(n+1) + 4*3*4^(n-1)+ 4*5 -15
that becomes 6*10^(n+1) +4( stuff div by 9) -15 now we must show 6*10^(n+1)-15 is div by 9
well, the right thing to do is do assume it to be true up to n ... rigorously and prove it or n+1
man ... i'm not comfortable with group theory
ohhhhh i found a similar method
|dw:1343150166152:dw| so we have the same sequence
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!