Please solve using Cramer's rule Give one value of t for which the system of equations x +3y=ty 3x+y =tx has infinitely many solutions. Please provide me with a worked example ...kind regards. I posted this problem a few days ago and got very helpful solutions using subtraction etc., Someone advised using cramers rule but i got stuck because the RHS of the equation is in the form tx and ty rather than numbers. Please help.
do you know how to find the determinant of a matrix?
in order to get infinite many solution you should get determinant =0
choose such a value of t for which the system determinants =0
simplifying we can write as x+3y-ty=0 3x-tx+y=0
@unseenoceans you getting the steps?
ok take t common in the above two equation to have something simple x+y(3-t)=0 (3-t)x+y=0
\[D_y=\left|\begin{matrix}1&0\\3-t&0\end{matrix}\right|=0\]hm... this does seem strange to use cramers rule here
can you find determinant of above system ?
...but the above is always zero, so that would suggest that the value of t does not matter now I'm confused :P
@TuringTest i think you missed t with y term in first equation.
in cramers rule you sub the RHS though
Yes , I know how to find determinant (ab-cd)
\[x+3y=ty, 3x+y=tx\]
this is from the problem sheet
\[\left[\begin{matrix}1 & 3-t \\ 3-t & 1\end{matrix}\right]\]
find the determinant of above ..let me know .you will get Quadratic equation set the equation equal to zero find the two roots. can you do this?
let me attempt
ok
is that 8-6t+t^2
roots are 2 and 4
I was advised when I first posted this problem that Cramers rule will be quickest. I am not so sure anymore
1-(3-t)(3-t)=1-9+6t-t^2=-8+6t-t^2=0 I don't think cramers rule is the fastest, it's easiest by inspection I would say
okay
use the above t value and you will have system of infinite solution.
Apart from the speed of solving the problem, can it be done with cramers rule, Turing?
you can also use Gauss jordon method to check..reduce the system to echelon form after putting t value and you will get one complete row of zeros
I am getting confused because sami's way works, but doesn't seem to be using cramers rule completely in the way I am used to
sami there are 2 t values : (2 and 4) the question asks for one value. Which one is the right one or are they both right?
it says "give one value" so I guess you could give either
cramer's rule is good for solving the system that have unique solution .for infinite use Gauss jordon.
I agree^
nice tip sami - do i reduce the second row to 0's?
How do you tell that above has infinite no solutions? DO you determine that from the question or is it because of the RHS : tx, ty?
the easiest way to check weather the system has infinite solutions is take determinent if its zero you will have infinite solutions lets use t=2 x+3y=2y 3x+y=2x or x+y=0 x+y=0 find determinant
also look at them these are both the equation of same line. and you may know that there are infinite no of solutions to a line. we get solution when the lines intersects. but (parallel lines intersects at infinity)
yes, I understand now. Great explanation Sami....much appreciated ...I'll be looking out for you and Turing test next time! Kind regards
Once again thank you Sami-21 and Turing Test. Goodbye.
you are Most welcome:) @unseenoceans . i will be glad to help you. that's what i do . i love to help students with their Questions .and make them Understand.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!