Use De Morgan’s laws to determine whether the two statements are equivalent. 10. ∼(p ∨ ∼q), ∼p ∧ q
Shld we be using truth tables?
yea
uuggghhhhh thats annoying on here okkk its not that terrible
Like u may have to stretch ur imagination to see the boxes
p q ~q pv~q ~(pv~q) T T F T F F T F F T T F T T F F F T T F ----------------------------------------- p q ~p ~p^q T T F F F T T T T F F F F F T F
Alrighty there you go This kinda just simple stuff u shld be able to do this on ur own What course r u taking?
btw we didnt use de morgan's laws we used truth tables so i kinda doubt this is what the question wanted
Of that graph the two statments are not equivalent then. Right
ummm well ulook at the answers the last row of each truth table r they the same?
no
Yes they r the last column of both r: F T F F
ok.thankyou
What class is this?
geometry mat1500
ummmm HS or university?
university
cuzzz I am not sure we shld be using truth tables I think we were suppossed to use de morgans laws
what do u think?
the question says de morgans law
In the book it has truth table s well
~(p v ~q) using De morgans laws becomes ~p ^ ~(~q) = ~p ^q
How about u show both
okay that will work
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!