.
@jim_thompson5910 i know i've asked you alot but this is my last time:)
i answered this before, let me find where I answered it, one sec
okay
Let me know if this works or not. Thanks. http://openstudy.com/users/jim_thompson5910#/updates/5014786fe4b0fa246730e98c
the whol thing or the 2nd last comment ?
the whole thing...my argument/proof spans the whole thread pretty much
let me know if you can make sense of it or not
alright I'll write it out here
alight , thanks:)
we know that PR = PR due to the reflexive property since PQRS is a kite, we know that the two adjacent pairs are congruent So PQ = PS and QR = RS Since these three corresponding sides are congruent, we can say triangle PQR congruent triangle PSR
With me so far?
ye im with you .
since triangle PQR congruent triangle PSR, the corresponding pieces and parts are congruent So angle PQR is congruent to angle PSR by the CPCTC property
Note: CPCTC = corresponding parts of congruent triangles are congruent
let me know if that makes sense
yeah i understand . is that all of it ?
yes
I'm glad you understand
thank you! :)
you're welcome
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!