What is a function
thi isnt as simple as it looks.is it
it has to be one to one and onto anything else?
http://finedrafts.com/files/Larson%20PreCal%208th/Larson%20Precal%20CH1.pdf pp 39 and on
i think it's one to one and many to one
many to one?
multiple x values corresponding to one y value...a horizontal line
1 to 1 only;
the perfect illustration is on pp 39
so horizontal line is a function, but a vertical line is not,
a function can be injective (one to one), surjective (onto), or bijective ( which is injective and surjective both)
there are test to test whether a graph is a function
one-to-one correspondence exactly one dependent value for each independent value basically what panlac said
so you're saying a horizontal line is not a function?
since horizontal line is a many-to-one correspondence
so what do you call it when one / many of these conditions are breached
I haven't seen the terms domain and range...
a horizontal line can be a function if it is parameterized or in a different coordinate system besides cartesian
breaching these definition makes it not a function; I know of no special term for that
is it a relation? i cant remember what that means exactly
it's a one-to-one correspondence say I have an independent variable t, and a dependent variable y examples: t | y --- 1|2 3|-5 0|2 2|7 function^ (each t is associated with exactly one y) as opposed to t | y --- 1|2 3|-5 0|2 1|7 ^not a function because the dependent variable t is associated with more than one variable y that is, when t=1 y= both 2 and 7 that is not a one-to-one correspondence because the independent variable t corresponds to more than one value of the dependent variable y for at least one value of t - in this case t=1 violates the definition of a funtion
more subtle examples: t | y --- 1|0 2|0 3|0 4|0 this is a function (f(t)=0) because each independent variable value is associated with a unique value of the dependent variable t | y --- 0|1 0|2 0|3 0|4 NOT a function because the independent variable t at t=0 corresponds to more than one value of the dependent variable y (since t=0 corresponds to y=1,2,3,4)
soa function needs a independent variable?
and a dependent variable ,
yes, a function has at least one dependent variable, and possibly multiple independent variables
and it can have lots of each , but it must have at lest one on both kinds
i think i get it now
can it have more than one independent variable? I think so, yes (though not positive)
should be the case as far as I can see the important part is the on-to-one correspondence between independent and dependent variables
consider \(\mathbb R^2 \mapsto \mathbb R^3\) position on a map corresponding to place on a globe
*the globe
right, that should be a function f(lattitude, longitude)=(whatever unique position on the globe) so yeah, I think that is a function
1 domain is limited to point at 1 range, but different domains can point to the same range.
latitude and longitude are linearly independent , in general, are variables necessarily are orthogonal ?
very good Q @UnkleRhaukus I don't think I'm qualified to answer that
I am not sure if I get the question. but if I were to think of a globe, I immediately picture the x and y axes, whereby the y is dependent to the x. so when you say orthogonal, I am not quire sure if you're looking at a symmetry in respect to x, y, or origin.
I'm wondering in general though if the independent variables of a function must be orthogonal in order to fulfill the definition. Clearly latitude and longitude bear a similarity to the rectangular coordinate system, but can we prove it for all coordinate systems?
I wonder if the question even has any meaning for cases like parametric functions...
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!