Let p and q represent the statements:
p: Jose is running track.
q: Jose is not winning the race.
Express the following statement symbolically:
Jose is winning the race..... a) p.. b) q.. c)~q.. d) ~p
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
@jim_thompson5910 is this the same as the last ones?
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
q: Jose is not winning the race.
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
~q is the opposite of q
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
So if q says one thing
then ~q (NOT q) says the complete opposite thing q says
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
so ~q is like saying
Jose is NOT not winning the race
...a bit confusing, but the two "not"s cancel giving us
~q: Jose is winning the race
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
so then its p?
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
p is the statement Jose is running track
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
agreed?
OpenStudy (anonymous):
yea
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
does that have anything to do with "Jose is winning the race" ?
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
not really
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
so "Jose is winning the race" doesn't involve p at all
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
reread what I wrote at the beginning of this thread
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
and hopefully something will click
OpenStudy (anonymous):
q?
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
closer, but still no
OpenStudy (anonymous):
~q
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
you got it
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
look above to see why
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
I wrote it out at the top
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
ohh i didnt even relize it, wow.... thank you so much, i also have 2 more, i have one that i really dont know
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
its ok, i was wondering about that lol
OpenStudy (anonymous):
Look at the argument below. Which of the following symbolic statements shows the set-up used to find the validity of the argument?
If Mario studies hard, then he gets good grades.
Mario got good grades.
Therefore, Mario studied hard.
p: Mario studies hard.
q: Mario gets good grades
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
First off, is that argument valid?
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
oh wait, nvm they're asking a different question
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
a.) [(p → q) ∧ ~q]
.'.p
b.)[(p → q) → q]
∴ p
c.)[(p → q) ∧ q]
∴ q
d.) [(p → q) ∧ q]
∴ p
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
hmm interesting way to put it
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
"If Mario studies hard, then he gets good grades." translates to ...???
OpenStudy (anonymous):
p?
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
p is just "Mario studies hard"
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
how do we incorporate the "he gets good grades" part?
OpenStudy (anonymous):
p -> q
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
good
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
"If Mario studies hard, then he gets good grades." translates to p -> q
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
now tack on the statement "Mario got good grades"
So what does
"If Mario studies hard, then he gets good grades. Mario got good grades. "
translate to ???
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
[(p → q) ∧ ~q] .'. p
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
not quite
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
~q means he did NOT get good grades, but it clearly says he did
OpenStudy (anonymous):
[(p → q) ∧ ~q]
.'. p
OpenStudy (anonymous):
[(p->q) ^q] .'. p
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
better
OpenStudy (anonymous):
so is that it then?
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
yes it is
OpenStudy (anonymous):
oh ok, thanks, and this will be the last one i promise,: Which of the following is the equivalent of the inverse statement? a.) the negation of the statement.. b.) the converse of the statement.... c.)the contrapositive of the statement... d.)the conditional statement
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
In general
Original = contrapositive
and
inverse = converse
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
So it's b)
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
the inverse of
p -> q
is
~p -> ~q
--------------
that's equivalent to
~~q -> ~~p
which is the same as
q -> p
but this is the converse
So this shows that the inverse and the converse represent the same thing