A company makes similar cylindrical containers in two sizes, as shown in the table below. Containers Radius (in centimeters) Volume (in cubic centimeters) Type 1 4 ? Type 2 7 1231.66 What is the volume, in cubic centimeters, of Type 1 containers? 2111.42 2155.41 402.17 229.81
Please help! Pretty please?
The answer I get is different than the answers provided, and I don't know what I am doing wrong.
Cylinder container is like a circle with a skirt. To compute volume you would find the area of the circular base and multiply by the height. So lets look at type I fpr which I see a problem, I don't have the height. How tall are these cylinders?
They don't provide the height.
I think we are to use the relationship between the two types of cylinder assuming they are the same height, but different radius.
Oh.... ok.
What I tried to do was (pi x 4^2 / pi x 7^2) = (x/1231.66) But it didn't exactly work out, for the answer I got was 1226.29 = x. And that isn't labeled as one of the options.
So..... It is quite a conundrum.
So, may anybody please give me a clue, as what to do?
So let us calculate the height of the Type 2. Volume=2pi r^2 h 1231.66 =2 pi 7 squared h\[1231.66 = 2\pi \times49\times h\]\[1231.66 \over 98 \pi = 4cm\] we can assume a height of 4 cm. Now for the volume of the type 1
V(Type 1)=2 pi r^2 * 4 Volume would then equal:\[2 \pi \times 16 \times 4 =402.1234 cu. cm. \]
OH... I never thought about it in that manner... Thank you... I, by myself would have never thought of finding the height through a reverse process. So then, by finding that out, you can plug it in to the formula to find out the answer we are seeking. It is more wise to view a problem through different views, so you could find all the different possibilities the problem in question may behold.
My satellite link failed because of a thunderstorm that we are having. Sorry for delay.
Did that value come close to one of your options?
Hold on, we may be getting some new input from Callisto.
Well, yes, it did come close to one of the answers.very close, in fact.
I have a Pi key on calculator which makes it very accurate.
Yes. The answer I have as one of the options provided, is rounded, so it came quite close. Only about a few hundredths off.
@iluvmangos , remember this was based on an assumption that the cylinder containers were equal height. Hopefully the assumption was a valid one.
Thank you. I am sure that it is. I will come on again in a few moments, and tell you if it is right or not.
And unfortunately it is marked wrong... but at least we tried. That's what counts.
@Callisto , did you have a comment?
I was hoping Callisto could straighten me out, obviously I have gone astray here.
I got some different actually..
*something
Well, this is certainly something I will ponder over..... and @Callisto , may you present your approach to the situation?
Did I err on the calculations or on the assumption?
I use property of similar figures to do it.. (ratio of sides)^3 = ratio of volume \[(\frac{4}{7})^3 = \frac{V}{1231.66}\] Solve V.
@radar I saw the problem.... ''Volume=2pi r^2 h'' It should be volume= pi r^2 h
Oh yes, I really boo booed! A=pi*r^2
I think I combined the formula for circumfurence and area lol
Oh goodness.... I guess that is where we went awry. Oops! ;)
And as usual there was a distractor that was close to my incorrect answer. Sorry about that iluvmangos.
Thanks Callisto for clarifying that for me. I will try not to do that any more.!!
I like your method Callisto as it eliminates having to use Pi.
Thanks for all the help you two have given me!
Did you get around 230 cu. cm for volume and was that an option.
You are welcome and sorry about the miscue.
The followings are quite useful: For similar figures, (ratio of sides)^2 = ratio of area (ratio of sides)^3 = ratio of volume Welcome and welcome and welcome :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!