Julie claims that: "The sum of any five consecutive positive integers is always divisible by five." Peter claims that: "the sum of any six consecutive integers is always divisible by six." Are they correct? justify your answer
Let's test julie's claim first sum of five consecutive positive integers being divisible by 5 the no.s will be of the form n, n+1, n+2, n+3, n+4 \(\text{n is a positive integer}\) Let's add them, let the sum be S \[S=n+n+1+n+2+n+3+n+4\] We get \[S=5n+1+2+3+4=>S=5n+10\] let's divide this by 5 \[\frac{s}{5}=\frac{5n+10}{5}=n+2\] so this is true
let the first number be x then the others are x+1, x+2, x+3, x+4 sum of them= x+x+1+x+2+x+3+x+4=5x+10=5(x+2) which is divisible by 5 therefore, it is correct. For peter's statment, use the same method to check if it is correct.
let take 1,2,3,4,5,6 as consecutive no and check 1+2+3+4+5 is divisible by five
@Lachlan1996 do you get this?
hold on one sec @ash2326 , could you explain what your doing please?
why are you adding on a second lot of integers to the first bit?
would it just be such that 5(n) where n is a positive integer, wouldnt this just mean that because it is 5n it divisible by 5, and thus the rule holds true?
Julie claims that: "The sum of any five consecutive positive integers is always divisible by five." so I took 5 consecutive positive integers, they will be of the form n, n+1, n+2, n+3 and n+4 here n can be any positve integer say if it's n=2 then the no.s are 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Do you get this part?
ah yes, youve just got a recursive sequence running as your integers
Next I'd summed them and then I divide the sum by 5 the quotient, We get is also a positive integer so Julie's claim is true
@Lachlan1996 do you get the idea?
uhh somewhat, this was just a random question in the misc section of my textbook. we have never been taught proofs, so i wasnt sure of how to approach it.
so basically i just let a variable, ie S = any positive integer then sum them.
yeah
okie doke, i see the idea now. Cheers for that mate.
Sorry, im a little slow picking up on things i havent been taught. Doing integration at the minute but came across this question and it stumped me... Anyway cheers for the help mate. Have a good night, and keep up the good work :)
yeah, Would you try the same for the second claim?
no problem, we are here to help. You're welcome:)
Okie doke, so answering the second
actually no sorry, stuffed that up
excuse my idiocy
you get 6n + 15, which is not divisible by 6 so it is not true
Right. @sai1234 's method is also good since it proves Peter's idea can't be always true.
okie doke, thanks very much mate.
@Lachlan1996 sorry I was afk second is not correct, you are right:)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!