Ask your own question, for FREE!
MIT 18.06 Linear Algebra, Spring 2010 21 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

A = [ 3 2 4 ] [ 2 0 2 ] [ 4 2 3 ] show that A is diagonalizable even though one eigenvector has algebraic multiplicity 2. Do this by brute force computation. write A = Q/\Q^T where Q's columns are orthogonal unit vectors of A.

OpenStudy (datanewb):

I'm embarrassed to say I did this the hard way. I solved \[|A-\lambda I| = 0\] which involved factoring a cubic function. \[\Lambda _{1} = 8, \Lambda _{2} = -1 , \Lambda _{3} = -1.\] Then once I found the repeated eigenvalue, I substituted it for lambda. The matrix\[A - \lambda I\] was only rank 1, so there were two different eigenvectors for the repeated lambda, which made three linearly independent eigenvectors in total! Which means A is diagonalizable. I would however appreciate someone showing how to factor \[A =Q \Lambda Q^{T}\] as I am only really familiar with the \[A = S \Lambda S ^{-1}\] factorization, and I feel there must be an easier way.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Thank you!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@datanewb FYI http://openstudy.com/study#/updates/50037f89e4b0848ddd694f98

OpenStudy (datanewb):

ah, thanks. That is a good thread. I now see that S is basically Q, almost. :) I think Strang talks about Q in the next section I'm about to read anyhow. I thought there might be an easier way to calculate lambda with a symmetric matrix. One correction in the way the question in this thread is stated: It says "one eigenvector has algebraic multiplicity 2," I believe it should be eigenvalue instead of eigenvector.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!