Determine which, if any, of the three statements are equivalent. Give a reason for your conclusion. Show complete work and submit your solution to the Dropbox. I) If the cat does not have claws, then the cat cannot scratch the furniture. II) If the cat can scratch the furniture, then the cat has claws. III) If the cat has claws, then the cat can scratch the furniture. a. I and II are equivalent b. I and III are equivalent c. II and III are equivalent d. I, II, and III are equivalent e. None are equivalent
if p, then q ; is logically equivalent to: if not q then not p
you lost me
then you should prolly review the chapter material on this subject .... since that is a fundamental priniciple that i expressed
that .. and words should never be used in math :)
I dont no I seem to get lost everytime when it come to this one I did read it
i still dont get it ome I di grt but not all
the more i read it the more i get lost too; I know 1 and 3 are equivalent structures, but then are they asking for truth values?
in some parts of mathing, equivalent and equal have 2 different meanings .... which is also confusing my rememberance :/
it dont seem to be asking for that
i cant even read the answer choices correctly .... "a" is my gut
so how would you show it we can just go with that and see got tou put something
well, the fundamental definition in the material for a contrapositive should suffice if p, then q is equivalent to if not q, then not p define p and q as the statements
p = (the cat doesnt have claws) q = (the cat cant scratch the furniture)
ok Il go with that and see I have more like this dont no if I can get them don
good luck :)
thanks and thank you for your help
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!