Look at the argument below. Which of the following symbolic statements shows the set-up used to find the validity of the argument?
If it is July, then I am living at the lake.
I am not living at the lake.
Therefore, it is not July.
p: It is July.
q: I am living at the lake.
A) [(p → q) ∧ ~q]
∴ p
B)[(p → q) → q]
∴ p
C)[(p → q) ∧ ~q]
∴ ~p
D)[(p → q) ∧ q]
∴ p
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (turingtest):
I think you lost a symbol in the act of copy-paste
OpenStudy (anonymous):
A) [(p → q) ∧ ~q]
∴ p
B)[(p → q) → q]
∴ p
C)[(p → q) ∧ ~q]
∴ ~p
D)[(p → q) ∧ q]
∴ p
OpenStudy (turingtest):
okay, so how does it say we write the part that says "I am living at the lake" ?
OpenStudy (anonymous):
ok
OpenStudy (anonymous):
q
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (turingtest):
correct, so how do we write the statement
"I am not living at the lake."
?
OpenStudy (anonymous):
i have no idea
OpenStudy (turingtest):
the negation symbol (NOT) is the tilde: ~
so if if "I am living at the lake": q
then "I am NOT living at the lake": ?
OpenStudy (anonymous):
[(p → q) ∧ ~q]
∴ ~p
OpenStudy (anonymous):
???
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!