Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
I got -0.19?
OpenStudy (anonymous):
this is what you need
\[x+3=\frac{\ln(7)}{\ln(2)}\]
\[x=\frac{\ln(7)}{\ln(2)}-3\] whatever that is
OpenStudy (anonymous):
Let me put it in the calculator
OpenStudy (anonymous):
2.31242306964
OpenStudy (lgbasallote):
lol how'd that happen..
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (lgbasallote):
you should get the same result from a while ago
OpenStudy (lgbasallote):
that \[\log_2 7 - 3 = x\]thing
OpenStudy (anonymous):
Oh oops
OpenStudy (lgbasallote):
so what did you get for \[\log_2 7 - 3\]
OpenStudy (anonymous):
-0.19
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (lgbasallote):
yup
OpenStudy (anonymous):
Ohhh for some reason I put in another answer even though that was was right. Nooo idea why.
OpenStudy (anonymous):
?
OpenStudy (anonymous):
^^^^ yes?
OpenStudy (anonymous):
Did you get different satellite
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (lgbasallote):
if he did..he's probably wrong =))) hahaha
OpenStudy (anonymous):
no it is right
my real question is, why write \(x=\log_2(7)-3\) ? i mean that is certainly correct, but unless you have an extra fancy calculator with log base two on it, you need to compute
\[\frac{\ln(7)}{\ln(2)}-3\]
OpenStudy (anonymous):
^^^ Lol. Satellite does have a point! Much easier to calculate.
OpenStudy (lgbasallote):
well because ln's are usually used in calculus
OpenStudy (lgbasallote):
and it's too much latex work to do \[\frac{\log 7}{\log 2}\] rather than \[\log_2 7\]
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (lgbasallote):
hayley knows what \(\log_2 7\) means anyway so heh..im using it..