Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 11 Online
OpenStudy (swissgirl):

Prove that the set \( \mathbb{Q^+} \) of positive rationals is denumerable

OpenStudy (swissgirl):

Can someone tell me what is wrong with the following proof

OpenStudy (swissgirl):

Consider the positive rationals in the array in Figure 1. Order this set by listing all the rationals in the first row, then the second row and so forth. Omitting the fractions that are not in the lowest terms, we have an ordering of \( \mathbb{Q^+} \) in which every poitive rational appears. Therefore \( \mathbb{Q^+} \) is denumerable

OpenStudy (swissgirl):

There are a few things wrong in my opinion. But what stands out the most?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I am no professional, but isn't an ordering of a set different from a one-to-one correspondence? In that respect, I do not have a problem with the proof. (Remember, the union of two countable sets is countable!)

OpenStudy (swissgirl):

@KingGeorge ?

OpenStudy (kinggeorge):

There's two (minor) things that bug me, and these are mostly notational I think. First, you don't have vertical dots at the bottom signifying you have fractions with a numerator larger than 7. So \(\frac{8}{9}\) doesn't appear anywhere. Second, you shouldn't have arrows going from 2/1 to 3/1 and 4/1 to 5/1 and 6/1 to 7/1.

OpenStudy (swissgirl):

wait a sec hmmmm

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Whoops! I didn't even look at the picture

OpenStudy (swissgirl):

okk well This wasnt the exact picture but this what i found when i googled for it. There are no arrow going across the first row and there shld be dots continuing at the bottom too

OpenStudy (swissgirl):

I am just not sure if you cld prove that teh set is denumerable from a diagram

OpenStudy (kinggeorge):

Those reasons are exactly the ones that I gave, so that's good I guess. By the simple fact that you could make the diagram, and put those arrows there, it is denumerable. If you tried doing it with a set that's infinite, and not countable, it wouldn't work.

OpenStudy (swissgirl):

Gonna drive you crazy with one more question. But if u dont have the time just tell me soo ok?

OpenStudy (kinggeorge):

I've still got some time. I'm not on a super tight schedule.

OpenStudy (swissgirl):

if its denumerable then it must have a bijection is that correct?

OpenStudy (kinggeorge):

correct.

OpenStudy (swissgirl):

so wldnt u have to prove that the set is denumerable if it has a bijection

OpenStudy (kinggeorge):

And those arrows give you the bijection.

OpenStudy (swissgirl):

okkkkkkkkkkkkkkk gotcha. Thanks KG :DDDDDDDD I totally drive you crazy

OpenStudy (kinggeorge):

No worries :P

OpenStudy (swissgirl):

Thanks @Herp_Derp

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!