which of the following possible base values of k is not consistent if y=f(x) is continuous, monotonic, and concave down for all values of x? a. 0 b. -2 c. 0.5 d. 6 e. 1
0, because there would not able a change in y value
can you explain further? sorry i'm so confused
if the function is concave down, it means that f''(x)<0.
by the way, what kind of funciton is this? exponential?
it isn't specified
If your teacher doesn't put in the effort to write good questions, then don't put in the effort to answer them.
actually, I think it's -2, because if we assume it's an exponential funcion, y=-2^x is only one that's concave down
what do you interpret base values of k to mean
what do you mean K to mean?
@lgbasallote @TuringTest @jim_thompson5910 , I need some help here
this question is too vague :/
If y = f(x) is continuous, monotonic and concave down, this means that f(x) is always decreasing over the interval (-infinity, infinity) Now if f(x) = k*g(x), then the above is only true if k is nonzero (g(x) is also continuous, monotonic and concave down). This my guess as to what/where k is if k were zero, then f(x) = 0, which would mean that it wouldn't be concave down anymore
so it would be at 0 because that's where it would no longer be concave down
that's my guess anyway, yes
thanks so much for your help but it was -2 :(
hmm then I'm thinking of something completely different
oh, if you had f(x) = k^x or something like that and k was negative, then it wouldn't be continuous for all real values of x. So that's why k = -2 doesn't work
but of course, that's all based on the assumption that f(x) = k^x or something similar to it
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!