May someone help me with a geometry question please? The question is attached in the file.
Try attaching it in a response, we don't see the file.
There is a graph involved, but it'll get all jumbled up, as soon as I put in in word form. Then not many people can understand it.
Look at the rhombus ABCD. Maddox made the following table to prove that diagonal AC of rhombus ABCD bisects its angles. Statements Justifications 1.ABCD is a Rhombus 1.Given 2. AB = BC = CD = DA 2. CPCTC 3. AC = AC 3.reflexive property 4. Triangle ABC is congruent to triangle ACD 4. SSS postulate 5. Angle BAC = angle DAC, angle BCA = angle DCA 5. definition of rhombus Which two justifications did Maddox interchange while making the table? Justification 2 and Justification 3 Justification 4 and Justification 5 Justification 3 and Justification 4 Justification 2 and Justification 5
And that's the problem.
first cannot change for sure
look closely at second justification
yes.... so is it the second and third?
it doesnt fit there. all sides are congruent is a definition of rhombus. its not CPCTC
so... ?
hmm...
I would say justification 2 and 4, but that isn't an option.....
4th justification is correct. it wont change. as triangles are congruent by SSS
third is also correct. a=a is a reflexive property
So it's the third option?
we just justified 3rd and 4th are good :)
you need to switch 2nd and 5th
ok.....
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!