Use a cardinality argument to prove that there is no universal set for all sets
this should be good
This relies on the idea that the cardinality of a set A is strictly less than the cardinality of the power set of A, P(A).
So is it smth like this ? \( card(U) \leq card(P(U)) \) but \( P(U) \subset U\)
so... that means that for the set of supposedly every possible element A we can construct a power set P(A) that has a higher cardinality, and therefore contains elements not in A ??? (just taking a stab at it)
P(U)⊂U ??? That's clearly false!
I was gonna say...
well its the universal subset
let me try again
but James just said that P(A) has a higher cardinality than A how could P(U)⊂U ??
However, it is true that if U exists, then P(U) = U. Now you can obtain a contradiction.
Turing how wld u show that its a proper subset in latex
what do you mean? I'm not sure what symbol you are referring too
|dw:1344641659469:dw| with that equal sign underneath
\subseteq\[\subseteq\]
ohhhh ok thanks
for future reference and welcome for my minor contribution :P
Thanks James
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!