Let \(f(A,*) \implies (B, \cdot)\) be homomorphic. Prove that if \(f^{-1}\)is a function then it is homomorphic
work directly from the definition the hard part is probably figuring out what you need to show, showing it is straight forward do you know what you need to do?
Well i need to show that it is a bijection?
oh no you only need to show what it asks you to show that the inverse function is a homomorphism you do not need to show that it is a bijection and in fact it need not be because you only know \(f\) is one to one, not necessarily onto
well it must be onto in order for the inverse to be a function
oh no
it just has to be one to one
ohhhhh noooooooooooooooo
idk i read that somewhere in my bookkk guess i am wrong
|dw:1345215076250:dw|
think of the map that send \(n\mathbb{Z}\to \mathbb{Z}\) via \(a\to a\)
wait if its not onto then only the range of F can be mapped to A
that is one to one, but certainly not onto you are only being asked to show that IF \(f\) is a homo and IF \(f\) is one to one (so the inverse exists) THEN \(f^{-1}\) is a homo
righhhttttttt
that is right only the range can be mapped to A
so the domain of \(f^{-1}\) is the range of \(f\), not necessarily all of \(B\)
ohhhhhhh okkkkkkkkkkkkkk
come up with some examples for yourself here is one, map \(\mathbb{R}\) to \(\mathbb{R}\times \mathbb{R}\) via \(x\to (x,0)\) this is certainly one to one, and invertible, but it is not onto for sure
yaaa
in any case your job is to show that \(f^{-1}\) is a homo, that is all you get to assume it exists, so you get to assume that \(f\) is one to one, and also you are given that \(f\) is homo
write down exactly what you have to show, and exactly what you know
right so that means that \( f(x_1*x_2)=f(x_1)*f(x_2) \)
careful
gotta give me a sec to see how i can pull it all together
ya there shld be that bullet
ok ill rewrite it
\(*\) is the operation in A, \(\cdot\) is the operation in B
\( f(x_1*x_2)=f(x_1) \cdot f(x_2) \)
you get to assume that, yes you also get to assume one more thing about \(f\)
now \(f^{-1}(y_1*y_2)=f^{-1}(y_1) \cdot f^{-1}(y_2) \)
can we assume that?
no
be careful about where things live \(x\in A,f(x)\in B\)
\(f^{-1}(y_1)=x_1 \)
ok
i assume you mean "let \(f^{-1}(y_1)=x_1\)"
yaaaaaaaaaaaa
Let \( f^{-1}(y_1)=x_1 \) and\( f^{-1}(y_2)=x_2 \)
don't forget we know one more thing about \(f\) namely that IF \(f(x)=f(x_2)\) THEN \(x_1=x_2\) we may need that later
ok good now what exactly do you want to show about this
hahah ok this may be incorrect \( f(f^{-1}(y_1)*f(^{-1}(y_2)) = f(f^{-1}(y_1)) \cdot f(f^{-1}(y_2)) \)
is this totally off track?
i think i is over complicated write down exactly what it means for \(f^{-1}\) to be a homo, being careful with the multiplication symbols then i think we can show it, once we know exactly what we need to show
in other words, as usual with a proof, write down precisely what is needed to be shown, working directly from the definition in other words, translate "\(f^{-1}\) is homomorphic" in to math
ok we need to show that \(f^{-1}(y_1 \cdot y_2) = f^{-1}(y_1)*f^{-1}(y_2) \)
|dw:1345216525226:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!