Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 16 Online
OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

@TuringTest i need some help...

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

\[\huge \mathcal L \left\{ \frac{\sin kt}{t} \right \}\]

OpenStudy (turingtest):

you wanna derive it from the definition?

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

if possible yes. or maybe a shortcut formula or something... i know i cant use gamma functions and make it into \[\mathcal L \{t^{-1} \sin kt \}\]

OpenStudy (cedric):

Help plz?

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

i also have no idea how to do \[\huge \int \limits_0^\infty e^{-st} \left(\frac{\sin kt}{t} \right) dt\]

OpenStudy (turingtest):

I just found the following:\[\mathcal L\left\{{f(t)\over t}\right\}=\int_s^\infty F(u)du\]now how to implement that... I gotta think it's a new formula for me

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

wonder what F(u) means...

OpenStudy (turingtest):

yeah, specifically the u part F(s) would be the Laplace of f(t)

OpenStudy (turingtest):

but what would we put for u I wonder...

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

for some odd reason wolfram gave me \[\tan^{-1} \left(\frac ks \right)\]

OpenStudy (turingtest):

\[\mathcal L\{\sin kx\}={k\over s^2+k^2}=F(s)\]so I guess\[\mathcal L\left\{{f(t)\over t}\right\}=\int_s^\infty {k\over s^2+k^2}du\]means \[u=kx\]??? I'm sorry, I need to investigate that

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

hmm so \[\mathcal L \left \{\frac{f(t)}{t} \right \} = \int \limits _0^\infty (\mathcal L \{f(t)\})dt\]

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

so it's \[\mathcal L \{\mathcal L \{f(t) \} \} \]

OpenStudy (turingtest):

yeah, but \[\mathcal L\{f(t)\}=F(s)\]and the form is\[\mathcal L \left \{\frac{f(t)}{t} \right \} = \int \limits _0^\infty F(u)du\]and so why the heck is it u not s...?

OpenStudy (phi):

u is a dummy variable, to replace the s (so you don't confuse the limit)

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

so F(u) is just like F(s)?

OpenStudy (phi):

I would replace s with u in your k/(s^2+k^2)

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

wolfram didnt agree though :C

OpenStudy (phi):

normally you would use s, but here, the lower limit is s, so to avoid confusion, people rename s to u

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

even if i remove the limits it says \[\int \frac{k}{s^2 + k^2} ds = \tan^{-1} (\frac sk)\] but it should be \[\tan^{-1} (\frac ks)\]

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

maybe we raise s/k to -1 because that's the power of t? lol

OpenStudy (turingtest):

that integral is right u=(ks)tan(theta)

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

they show different :C

OpenStudy (phi):

If you put in the limit, sage gives 1/2*pi - arctan(s/k) which I think is the same as arctan(k/s)

OpenStudy (turingtest):

can we just say\[u=ks\implies du=kds\implies\frac{du}k=dx\]so\[\int_s^\infty F(u)du=\frac1k\int{\over}{ds\over{(\frac sk)^2}+1}\]

OpenStudy (turingtest):

wolf agrees with this^

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

hmm im lost...

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

can we start from the beginning again?

OpenStudy (phi):

If you put in the limits, it works \[ \int \frac{k}{u^2 + k^2} ds = \tan^{-1} (\frac uk) \] for u= s to oo you get atan(inf)- atan(s/k) = atan(k/s)

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

why ds?

OpenStudy (phi):

cut and paste problem. du

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

so you're putting u as s right?

OpenStudy (phi):

u is a dummy variable of integration (s or u does not matter) but when you plug in the limit s, you may lose track of which s you are looking at.

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

okay... i get tan^-1 (u/k) what happens after that?

OpenStudy (phi):

okay... i get tan^-1 (u/k) don't you mean tan^-1(k/s)

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

no..i meant i get how you got tan^-1 (u/k) what did you do next?

OpenStudy (phi):

put in the limits u goes from s to infinity

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

what does that mean?

OpenStudy (phi):

just like integral x dx from x=0 to 1: x^2/2 from x=0 to 1: 1/2 -0= 1/2

OpenStudy (turingtest):

well, we got\[\mathcal L\{\sin kt\}={k\over s^2+k^2}=F(s)\]which implies that if we want to call this \(F(u)\) then\[u=s\implies du=ds\]\[\mathcal L\left\{{f(t)\over t}\right\}=\int_s^\infty F(u)du=\int_s^\infty {k\over u^2+k^2}du\]\[=\left.\tan^{-1}(\frac uk)\right|_s^\infty=\frac\pi2-\tan^{-1}(\frac sk)\]ok, what did I do wrong?

OpenStudy (phi):

@TuringTest looks good but 90 - atan(s/k) = atan(k/s)

OpenStudy (turingtest):

oh shnap, I totally forgot that! thanks phi :)

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

wiat... is that \[\Large \int \limits_s^\infty\] or \[\Large \int \limits_0^\infty\]

OpenStudy (turingtest):

\[\int_s^\infty\]

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

...still not seeing

OpenStudy (turingtest):

starting from s is a result if the /t part...

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

oh

OpenStudy (turingtest):

I don't know how to derive that :/

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

no wonder im getting wrong answers from wolfram

OpenStudy (turingtest):

well it looks like between us we have wolf's answer, so I think we got it did you enter the integral from 0 ?

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

so how come \[90 - \tan^{-1} (\frac sk) = \tan^{-1} (\frac ks)\] and yes @TuringTest

OpenStudy (turingtest):

erm, it's an identity, let me look at a unit circle for a minute brb

OpenStudy (phi):

one way is notice that if one angle of a right angle is A, the other is 90-A and tan(A)= 1/tan(90-A)

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

so in generalization... \[\Large \mathcal L \left \{ \frac{f(t)}{t} \right \} = \int \limits_s^\infty F(u) du\] then F(u) is just F(s) but replace s with u

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

did i say that right?

OpenStudy (phi):

tan A= y/x --> A = atan(y/x) tan (90-A)= x/y --> 90-A= atan(x/y)

OpenStudy (phi):

yes

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

cool. i'll get some practice for now then

OpenStudy (turingtest):

|dw:1345255655635:dw|

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!