Part 1: Create a relation of five ordered pairs that is a function. In complete sentences explain why this relation is a function. Part 2: Create a relation of five ordered pairs that is not a function. In complete sentences explain why this relation is not a function.
make up any 5 ordered pairs you like, just don't repeat the first numbers anything at all
for part 1 then for part 2 make up another 5 ordered pairs, only this time DO repeat one or more of the first numbers this will not be a function precisely because the first numbers repeat
gabby do u do flvs
that is all there is to this
(2, -1) , (4,6) , (1,0) , (8,10) , (3,5) That would be for part 1 or part 2???
@briszabo no, i used to
@Gabylovesyou yes that would work for part 1
but i might get it wrong cuz its exactly the one u put (yes im in FLVS) lol was scared to say it
at the risk of repeating myself, the example is right, the reasoning is wrong, so don't use it
@satellite73 what is the reason that it is a function??
(2, -1) , (4,6) , (1,0) , (8,10) , (3,5) would work for part 1, because the numbers \(\{2,4,1,8,3\}\) aer all different
i.e. they do not repeat that is your only concern, whether the first numbers repeat or do not repeat
so i put This relation is a function because they do not repeat
if they do not repeat, it is a function if they do repeat, it is not a function
be more precise the "they" is the domain elements, i.e. the first numbers
ohh yea i am im taking algebra so i can make up my grade for algrebra i have ms.campbell and what i said is right the math teacher wants it to be specific so u would say that every y value has only one x value
ok...... Can you give me part 2 @satellite73
yea
This relation is a function because they do not repeat maybe change to This relation is a function because the first numbers do not repeat or This relation is a function because the domain elements are all different. something like that
the answers i actually turned into my teacher i got from a website
save me lord
{(-1,7) , (1,-7),(1, 7),(33, 7),(32, 7)} its not a function because the y value has more then one x value each.
@satellite73 can i use that ^^^^^^ for part 2??
@Gabylovesyou make up an example where the first numbers do repeat it will not be a function precisely because of that reason no, that is wrong i repeat, the example is right (it is not a function) the reasoning is INCORRECT
what reasoning can i put for that function @satellite73
by which i mean this line its not a function because the y value has more then one x value each. is totally wrong
@satellite73 what do i put then?
i give up i got it right for a reason apparently
@Gabylovesyou make up your own example anything just make sure the at least one of the first number repeats the reason the relation will not be a function is precisely because the first number repeats
mmmmmmmm can you make one for me??
@briszabo you are being cheated by bad math instructors, and you should be angry about it.
ok sure i will give you an example, but then you should make up your own
-_- awwww
lol
(4,-2), (1,-1) (0,0), (1,1), (4,2)
why isn't it a function? because there is a repetition in the first numbers. the numbers 4 and 1 both appear twice in the first coordinate now make up your own example
ok...
-2, -1 -1,0 0,3 1,0 1,15
@satellite73
good example not a function because the 1 in the first coordinate repeats
k thank you soo much!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!