Consider the function f(x)=(x-3)^2+2. Evaluate a sum to approximate the area under the curve for the domain 0 £ x £ 2 using the type of rectangles in each part. a. Use inscribed rectangles 0.5 units wide. b. Use circumscribed rectangles 0.5 units wide.
x= 0 to 2?
how did the \(\leq\) turn in to a £ ??
not sure this question has me so confused
intervals are of length \(.5\) so you have the points \(0,.5,1,1.5,2\) so contend with
your job is to multiply base times height of 4 rectangles and add them up the base of each of these 4 rectangles is \(.5\) and the height is what you get when you replace \(x\) by \(.5,1,1.5,2\) respectively
it is not that simple Sat. Since they want different sample points.
Use inscribed rectangles 0.5 units wide. since your function is decreasing on \([0,2]\) use the right hand endpoints for inscribed, and the left hand endpoints for circumscribed
I always hated Riemann sums
for inscribed it is \[f(.5)\times .5+f(1)\times .5+f(1.5)\times .5+f(2)\times .5\] or more simply put \[\left(f(.5)+f(1)+f(1.5)+f(2)\right)\times .5\]
circumscribed is \[\left(f(0)+f(.5)+f(1)+f(1.5)\right)\times .5\]
hope this is clear, your function \(f(x)=(x-3)^2+2\) has vertex at \((3,2)\) on your interval it is deceasing, making the left hand endpoints the largest, giving you circumscribed rectangles, and the right hand endpoints as the smallest giving you inscribed
so a. would be (f(.5)+f(1)+f(1.5)+f(2))×.5 and b. would be (f(0)+f(.5)+f(1)+f(1.5))×.5?
yes exactly, for the reason above on \([0,2]\) function is decreasing http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=y%3D%28x-3%29^2%2B2
thank you! you really helped me understand the reason behind the answer and went in-depth with explaining :)
|dw:1345604558691:dw|
clear right? left hand endpoints are the largest rectangles, each has base \(.5\) yw
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!