Simplify if possible. If an expression cannot be simplified, write "not possible" as the answer. 3√2-2√3
\[3=\sqrt{3}\sqrt{3}\] and \[2= \sqrt{2}\sqrt{2}\] can you simplify it now?
No, I'm still really confused.
\[\sqrt{3}\sqrt{3}\sqrt{2}-\sqrt{2}\sqrt{2}\sqrt{3}= \]
now?
Oh god.
I have no idea what is going on in this problem.
\[\sqrt{3}*\sqrt{2}(\sqrt{3}-\sqrt{2})\]
do I multiply 3 with the square root of 2?
yes
\[\sqrt{6}(\sqrt{3}-\sqrt{2})\]
is it clear now?
No, I'm still really lost.
i have just broken 3 =\[\sqrt{3}*\sqrt{3}\] similarly 2 and then took common from them..check out the above comments
I just need to mainly know the order of how to solve the problem. I don't want it rearranged or reworded, I just wanna know if it should look something like this... 3(√2)-2(√3)
√2= 1.41, correct?
yes that is what i have done....i have simplified it further....but it is fine too...and yes that's correct
ok, so then 3 multiplied by the √2 would be like... 4.24?
yes..
so would I take (4.24)-(2(√3))?
4.24-3.46?
you can also take \[2\sqrt{3}=2*1.732=3.46\]
yes,now subtract and find the exact value
so the answer would be .78?
yes
Changing irrationals into decimals is generally frowned upon by math instructors. What you started with is about as simple as it gets. You can change it a little, but not make it "simpler". I think your answer was "not possible".
well it is possible, it's just frowned upon, yes?
Actually, it is not possible to represent an irrational number as a decimal accurately. You must round.
to the nearest 10th, or what?
Rounding makes it wrong.
I don't wanna put down not possible though and then they get upset that I didn't try and simplify it.
is it breaking any mathematical rules or laws to turn these into decimals?
Ghazi had great ideas for manipulating it... but I think that is your answer.
well it's better to leave it under square roots....but it's fine if you have to reduce it further
because they ask me for the square root of 3, and 5, and 6 multiple times in future questions.
Do they give you advice on how to round for those... like "to the nearest..."
No, they don't tell me anything, which is why I'm a little flustered about it.
Good point.
they do have an example... √0.09= 0.3
A math teacher usually wants exact... meaning with the radicals. An engineer or scientist would round, so they can use it in real life.
Your example is exact.
so should I round to the nearest tenth... or?
.8?
I would mark it wrong. If I were your instructor, I would be looking for "not possible".
ok, I guess that's what I'll put
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!