Prolly simple enough, but; given: f'(-1)=2, f'(3)=-1/4, and f'(4)=1 can you determine a suitable (non-piecewise) F(x) that matches?
you are the master at arranging a quadratic given three points.
indeed, but if we forma quadratic with these, doesnt that mean F(x) would be linear? and have the same slope at any given point?
i remember this discussion before, you figured it out in your dreams or something. i always did it the donkey way,
:)
you must have missed your coffee this morning \(f'\) is quadratic, \(f\) is degree cubic
im thinking in reverse arent i
oh, and the coffee is finally out ;) thnx
i think in reverse at least half the time the other half i think in neutral, and the third half i think in third
lol, i have a one track mind that is usually derailed
this question is "prolly simple enough" :D
i had to write it in the teeny vernacular so that the youngins could appreciate it ;)
"youngins" :D too much appreciated sir.
i spose we could make it more challenging and say that F(x) has to at least be a 5th degree polynomial
Oh "challenging" kinggeorge is enough for that..sir
then we shall keep it at a 3rd degree :)
given 3 points, we can form a setup with 3 coeffs \(c_1,c_2, and ~c_3\) such that the given x values work to zero out the unknown\[y=c_1+c_2(x-x_1)+c_3(x-x_1)(x-x_2)\]
ok ...
you can use the points in any order, but for sake of simplicity; ill just use them as stated such that \[y=c_1+c_2(x+1)+c_3(x+1)(x-3)\] when x=-1, y=2 \[2=c_1+c_2(-1+1)+c_3(-1+1)(-1-3)\] \[2=c_1+0\] when x=3; y= -1/4 \[-1/4=2+c_2(3+1)+c_3(3+1)(3-3)\] \[-1/4-2=c_2(4)\] \[-9/16=c_2\] etc
|dw:1345900774583:dw|from the figure it is clear that f'(x) cannot be linear....... so let f'(x) be a quadratic, ax^2+bx+c then , f'(x)=ax^2+bx+c Now, I think we can use three given points to find a,b,c........and after that we can find f(x)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!