Given set A = {1,2,3,4,...,4022} If subset of A consists of k elements which satisfy there are 2 prime numbers each other, so the possible value of k is ....? a. 2 b. 2012 c. 2013 d. 4022 e. 4023
"which satisfy there are 2 prime numbers each other" rewrite that please
least consists there are 2 prime numbers, maybe..
B is a subset of A with k elements and at least has 2 prime numbers in it
so u want the possible value of k
yeah, i think like that mukushla... thanks
2 prime numbers or 2 coprime numbers?
two prime numbers
i believe that jean is right...because none of the options are correct
i mean 2 coprime
why? give me ur reasons?
i mean options are not logical if they mean 2 prime B={4,6,8,...,4022,3,9,15,...4017} which its elements are more than 2012 and the trivial option to choose will be 4022
that example contradicts other options except 4022
Ok... how about u if B is a subset of A with k elements and always has 2 prime numbers in it?
u mean to find minimum value of k such that the statement is true ha? B is a subset of A with k elements and always has 2 prime numbers in it...find the minimumvalue of k?
yes..
*minimum value
that will not be a nice problem because we just need to count prime numbers on the interval [1.4022] and nothing more than that
there are 556 primes less than 4022
so the minimum value of k will be 4022-556+2=3468
jean what is the answer for coprimes?
if i want to find the possible value of k, how?
possible values of k : \(3468\le k\le4022\)
so, the answer is 4022?
with that options yes 4022
but if B={2,3,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,...,4022} n(B) = 2013?
is right to mukushla?
but if B={9,15,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,...,4022} n(B)=2013 and there is no prime in it
hehe.. lol so, the best correct anwer is 4022 thank you...
@mukushla, is the best correct option is 4022?
sorry i was out yes more correct answer is 4022
ups... one more how do u know there are 556 primes less than 4022?
lol God of Wolfram told me http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=primes+less+than+4022
hahaha.. i think u have the special formula, not from wolfram :D
emm i think there is no formula for that ... just some approax formula http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_number_theorem
okok.. thanks, see u later.. by
see u.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!