what condition would satisfy 2+2=5
if mathmatics was faulty
is this a serious question?
reported.
@HawkCrimson this is a serious question
this is possible if you're a mathematician. If you're an engineer, it's not possible
And don't even think about it if you're a doctor.
Its logic so nothing in the universe will make 2 + 2 = 5
If zero or one are defined oddly, this could be the case. And, why would you report this question? For example, this is possible in the ring \(\mathbb{Z}/0\mathbb{Z}\)
A mental one.
mathematicians believe in the impossible and improbable
Since the only element in the ring is \(\{0\}\), and the other numbers are defined in terms of identities, every number could actually be a redundant symbol for such.
well, this would happen if you assumed 4 by the symbol of 5 :)
Correction to my post, I meant the ring \(\mathbb{Z}/1\mathbb{Z}\)
This is possible on a planet where people don't know Mathematics.
If the symbol \(2\) represented the quantity \(2.5\), then this would be true.
I think the author is expecting a reference from 1984, so here's one: In Oceania, 2 + 2 = 5.
Orwell?
@nincompoop whose answer r u going to trust at? Sorry but i oppose such questions. There is no-one who can give correct answer.
@nincompoop Yes, Orwell's novel 1984.
2 people have demonstrated that it is possible and 1 person made a good reference. May I just add the terms "precision and accuracy?"
You will have to define the symbol 2, +, = and 5.
Yes, it is possible. Consider \(\mathbb{Z}\) as the integers, and do not define that, in any manner, \(0\ne 1\). Therefore, \(\mathbb{Z}\) is indifferentiable from \(\{0\}\), so, any operation conducted under such ring given any number is valid, and equal, for all numbers in \(\mathbb{Z}\), given those axioms.
If you go back to basics, then I'd say that the definitions would do so. If 2 was to be defined as 2.5, then yes.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!